[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e72c243b-a50f-510b-5e21-10c3a38176db@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:51:31 +0200
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>, acme@...nel.org,
jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com
Cc: Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf script: Fix overrun issue for dynamically-allocated
pmu type number
On 26/11/20 5:24 am, Jin Yao wrote:
> When unpacking the event which is from dynamic pmu, the array
> output[OUTPUT_TYPE_MAX] may be overrun. For example, type number of
> SKL uncore_imc is 10, but OUTPUT_TYPE_MAX is 7 now (OUTPUT_TYPE_MAX =
> PERF_TYPE_MAX + 1).
>
> /* In builtin-script.c */
> process_event()
> {
> unsigned int type = output_type(attr->type);
>
> if (output[type].fields == 0)
> return;
> }
>
> output[10] is overrun.
>
> Create a type OUTPUT_TYPE_OTHER for dynamic pmu events, then
> output_type(attr->type) will return OUTPUT_TYPE_OTHER here.
>
> Note that if PERF_TYPE_MAX ever changed, then there would be a conflict
> between old perf.data files that had a dynamicaliy allocated PMU number
> that would then be the same as a fixed PERF_TYPE.
>
> Example:
>
> perf record --switch-events -C 0 -e "{cpu-clock,uncore_imc/data_reads/,uncore_imc/data_writes/}:SD" -a -- sleep 1
> perf script
>
> Before:
> swapper 0 [000] 1479253.987551: 277766 cpu-clock: ffffffff9d4ddb6f cpuidle_enter_state+0xdf ([kernel.kallsyms])
> swapper 0 [000] 1479253.987797: 246709 cpu-clock: ffffffff9d4ddb6f cpuidle_enter_state+0xdf ([kernel.kallsyms])
> swapper 0 [000] 1479253.988127: 329883 cpu-clock: ffffffff9d4ddb6f cpuidle_enter_state+0xdf ([kernel.kallsyms])
> swapper 0 [000] 1479253.988273: 146393 cpu-clock: ffffffff9d4ddb6f cpuidle_enter_state+0xdf ([kernel.kallsyms])
> swapper 0 [000] 1479253.988523: 249977 cpu-clock: ffffffff9d4ddb6f cpuidle_enter_state+0xdf ([kernel.kallsyms])
> swapper 0 [000] 1479253.988877: 354090 cpu-clock: ffffffff9d4ddb6f cpuidle_enter_state+0xdf ([kernel.kallsyms])
> swapper 0 [000] 1479253.989023: 145940 cpu-clock: ffffffff9d4ddb6f cpuidle_enter_state+0xdf ([kernel.kallsyms])
> swapper 0 [000] 1479253.989383: 359856 cpu-clock: ffffffff9d4ddb6f cpuidle_enter_state+0xdf ([kernel.kallsyms])
> swapper 0 [000] 1479253.989523: 140082 cpu-clock: ffffffff9d4ddb6f cpuidle_enter_state+0xdf ([kernel.kallsyms])
>
> After:
> swapper 0 [000] 1397040.402011: 272384 cpu-clock: ffffffff9d4ddb6f cpuidle_enter_state+0xdf ([kernel.kallsyms])
> swapper 0 [000] 1397040.402011: 5396 uncore_imc/data_reads/:
> swapper 0 [000] 1397040.402011: 967 uncore_imc/data_writes/:
> swapper 0 [000] 1397040.402259: 249153 cpu-clock: ffffffff9d4ddb6f cpuidle_enter_state+0xdf ([kernel.kallsyms])
> swapper 0 [000] 1397040.402259: 7231 uncore_imc/data_reads/:
> swapper 0 [000] 1397040.402259: 1297 uncore_imc/data_writes/:
> swapper 0 [000] 1397040.402508: 249108 cpu-clock: ffffffff9d4ddb6f cpuidle_enter_state+0xdf ([kernel.kallsyms])
> swapper 0 [000] 1397040.402508: 5333 uncore_imc/data_reads/:
> swapper 0 [000] 1397040.402508: 1008 uncore_imc/data_writes/:
>
> Fixes: 1405720d4f26 ("perf script: Add 'synth' event type for synthesized events")
It does not look to me like the problem was introduced by that commit. Are
you sure this Fixes tag is correct?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists