[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47442f07-4ea2-46ed-59a8-c1fa2857f4c4@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:54:37 +0000
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
CC: <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
<lenb@...nel.org>, <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<maz@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] genirq/affinity: Add irq_update_affinity_desc()
Hi Daniel,
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 01:20:37AM +0800, John Garry wrote:
>> + activated = irqd_is_activated(&desc->irq_data);
>> + if (activated)
>> + irq_domain_deactivate_irq(&desc->irq_data);
>> +
>> + if (affinity->is_managed) {
>> + irqd_set(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_AFFINITY_MANAGED);
>> + irqd_set(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_MANAGED_SHUTDOWN);
>> + }
>> +
>> + cpumask_copy(desc->irq_common_data.affinity, &affinity->mask);
>> +
>> + /* Restore the activation state */
>> + if (activated)
>> + irq_domain_deactivate_irq(&desc->irq_data);
> Shouldn't this be irq_domain_activate_irq() ?
Yeah, I think so. Blushes.
Cheers,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists