lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201126155421.14901-24-dbrazdil@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:54:21 +0000
From:   David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>
To:     kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 23/23] kvm: arm64: Fix EL2 mode availability checks

With protected nVHE hyp code interception host's PSCI CPU_ON/SUSPEND
SMCs, the host starts seeing new CPUs boot in EL1 instead of EL2. The
kernel logic that keeps track of the boot mode needs to be adjusted.

Add a static key enabled if KVM protected nVHE initialization is
successful.

When the key is enabled, is_hyp_mode_available continues to report
`true` because its users either treat it as a check whether KVM will be
/ was initialized, or whether stub HVCs can be made (eg. hibernate).

is_hyp_mode_mismatched is changed to report `false` when the key is
enabled. That's because all cores' modes matched at the point of KVM
init and KVM will not allow cores not present at init to boot. That
said, the function is never used after KVM is initialized.

Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c          | 10 +++++++---
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
index 2fde1186b962..f7cf3f0e5297 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
@@ -65,9 +65,19 @@ extern u32 __boot_cpu_mode[2];
 void __hyp_set_vectors(phys_addr_t phys_vector_base);
 void __hyp_reset_vectors(void);
 
+DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kvm_protected_mode_initialized);
+
 /* Reports the availability of HYP mode */
 static inline bool is_hyp_mode_available(void)
 {
+	/*
+	 * If KVM protected mode is initialized, all CPUs must have been booted
+	 * in EL2. Avoid checking __boot_cpu_mode as CPUs now come up in EL1.
+	 */
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM) &&
+	    static_branch_likely(&kvm_protected_mode_initialized))
+		return true;
+
 	return (__boot_cpu_mode[0] == BOOT_CPU_MODE_EL2 &&
 		__boot_cpu_mode[1] == BOOT_CPU_MODE_EL2);
 }
@@ -75,6 +85,14 @@ static inline bool is_hyp_mode_available(void)
 /* Check if the bootloader has booted CPUs in different modes */
 static inline bool is_hyp_mode_mismatched(void)
 {
+	/*
+	 * If KVM protected mode is initialized, all CPUs must have been booted
+	 * in EL2. Avoid checking __boot_cpu_mode as CPUs now come up in EL1.
+	 */
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM) &&
+	    static_branch_likely(&kvm_protected_mode_initialized))
+		return false;
+
 	return __boot_cpu_mode[0] != __boot_cpu_mode[1];
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 6ec8ddf74643..b153c08e50fa 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@
 __asm__(".arch_extension	virt");
 #endif
 
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kvm_protected_mode_initialized);
+
 DECLARE_KVM_HYP_PER_CPU(unsigned long, kvm_hyp_vector);
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, kvm_arm_hyp_stack_page);
@@ -1877,12 +1879,14 @@ int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque)
 	if (err)
 		goto out_hyp;
 
-	if (is_protected_kvm_enabled())
+	if (is_protected_kvm_enabled()) {
+		static_branch_enable(&kvm_protected_mode_initialized);
 		kvm_info("Protected nVHE mode initialized successfully\n");
-	else if (in_hyp_mode)
+	} else if (in_hyp_mode) {
 		kvm_info("VHE mode initialized successfully\n");
-	else
+	} else {
 		kvm_info("Hyp mode initialized successfully\n");
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 
-- 
2.29.2.454.gaff20da3a2-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ