linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] OP-TEE driver for v5.11

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHUa44Fnj4zQ_3O+kdzVopVAggUOdb34KGnA8+r=Rp-4+etWbw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:14:59 +0100
From:   Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     arm-soc <arm@...nel.org>, SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org,
        Rui Miguel Silva <rui.silva@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] OP-TEE driver for v5.11

Hi Arnd,

On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 10:00 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 1:01 PM Jens Wiklander
> <jens.wiklander@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hello arm-soc maintainers,
> >
> > Please pull this small patch which allows the OP-TEE driver to work with
> > ARMv7 based single CPU systems.
>
> Can you rebase that branch onto -rc1? I had started the arm/drivers
> branch early on top of that, so I'd prefer to avoid a backmerged.
>
> For the commit itself, shouldn't that be marked as a bugfix and get
> merged into v5.10 instead? If it should, you don't have to rebase
> since the arm/fixes branch is already ahead.

Yes it is a bit of a bugfix, so if you don't mind taking it as that
I'm sure that Rui would be happy to get it in this release.

>
> Also, it would be nice to Cc linux-arm-kernel on the pull request
> in addition to linux-kernel.

I'll keep that in mind the next time. Thanks for the feedback.

Cheers,
Jens