linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/7] mm,hwpoison: Remove drain_all_pages from shake

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201127072021.GA3999@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:20:21 +0100
From:   Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] mm,hwpoison: Remove drain_all_pages from shake_page

On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 02:52:32PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > @@ -275,9 +275,6 @@ void shake_page(struct page *p, int access)
> >   		lru_add_drain_all();
> >   		if (PageLRU(p))
> >   			return;
> > -		drain_all_pages(page_zone(p));
> > -		if (PageLRU(p) || is_free_buddy_page(p))
> > -			return;
> 
> I wonder if page in the lru pagevec can in fact become free after draining
> the lru - in that case we could keep the is_free_buddy_page() check.

Uhm, yes, I think it can happen.
After all, once the page hits one of the inactives' LRU it can be
reclaimed.

I am fine with joining the left PageLRU and is_free_buddy_page check.

Will do that in the next revision.

Thanks!

-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3