[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201127120219.GQ31550@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 13:02:19 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: Charan Teja Kalla <charante@...eaurora.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"vinmenon@...eaurora.org" <vinmenon@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memory_hotplug: put migration failure information
under DEBUG_VM
On Fri 27-11-20 15:53:14, Charan Teja Kalla wrote:
> Thanks Michal!!
>
> On 11/26/2020 2:48 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 25-11-20 16:18:06, Charan Teja Kalla wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/24/2020 1:11 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >>> On Mon 23-11-20 20:40:40, Charan Teja Kalla wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks Michal!
> >>>> On 11/23/2020 7:43 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon 23-11-20 19:33:16, Charan Teja Reddy wrote:
> >>>>>> When the pages are failed to get isolate or migrate, the page owner
> >>>>>> information along with page info is dumped. If there are continuous
> >>>>>> failures in migration(say page is pinned) or isolation, the log buffer
> >>>>>> is simply getting flooded with the page owner information. As most of
> >>>>>> the times page info is sufficient to know the causes for failures of
> >>>>>> migration or isolation, place the page owner information under DEBUG_VM.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I do not see why this path is any different from others that call
> >>>>> dump_page. Page owner can add a very valuable information to debug
> >>>>> the underlying reasons for failures here. It is an opt-in debugging
> >>>>> feature which needs to be enabled explicitly. So I would argue users
> >>>>> are ready to accept a lot of data in the kernel log.
> >>>>
> >>>> Just thinking how frequently failures can happen in those paths. In the
> >>>> memory hotplug path, we can flood the page owner logs just by making one
> >>>> page pinned.
> >>>
> >>> If you are operating on a movable zone then pages shouldn't be pinned
> >>> for unbound amount of time. Yeah there are some ways to break this
> >>> fundamental assumption but this is a bigger problem that needs a
> >>> solution.
> >>>
> >>>> Say If it is anonymous page, the page owner information
> >>>> shows is something like below, which is not really telling anything
> >>>> other than how the pinned page is allocated.
> >>>
> >>> Well you can tell an anonymous page from __dump_page, all right, but
> >>> this is not true universally.
> >>>
> >>>> page last allocated via order 0, migratetype Movable, gfp_mask
> >>>> 0x100dca(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE|__GFP_ZERO)
> >>>> prep_new_page+0x7c/0x1a4
> >>>> get_page_from_freelist+0x1ac/0x1c4
> >>>> __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x12c/0x378
> >>>> do_anonymous_page+0xac/0x3b4
> >>>> handle_pte_fault+0x2a4/0x3bc
> >>>> __handle_speculative_fault+0x208/0x3c0
> >>>> do_page_fault+0x280/0x508
> >>>> do_translation_fault+0x3c/0x54
> >>>> do_mem_abort+0x64/0xf4
> >>>> el0_da+0x1c/0x20
> >>>> page last free stack trace:
> >>>> free_pcp_prepare+0x320/0x454
> >>>> free_unref_page_list+0x9c/0x2a4
> >>>> release_pages+0x370/0x3c8
> >>>> free_pages_and_swap_cache+0xdc/0x10c
> >>>> tlb_flush_mmu+0x110/0x134
> >>>> tlb_finish_mmu+0x48/0xc0
> >>>> unmap_region+0x104/0x138
> >>>> __do_munmap+0x2ec/0x3b4
> >>>> __arm64_sys_munmap+0x80/0xd8
> >>>>
> >>>> I see at some places in the kernel where they put the dump_page under
> >>>> DEBUG_VM, but in the end I agree that it is up to the users need. Then
> >>>> there are some users who don't care for these page owner logs.
> >>>
> >>> Well, as I've said page_owner requires an explicit enabling and I would
> >>> expect that if somebody enables this tracking then it is expected to see
> >>> the information when we dump a page state.
> >>>
> >>>> And an issue on Embedded systems with these continuous logs being
> >>>> printed to the console is the watchdog timeouts, because console logging
> >>>> happens by disabling the interrupts.
> >>>
> >>> Are you enabling page_owner on those systems unconditionally?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yes, We do always enable the page owner on just the internal debug
> >> builds for memory analysis, But never on the production kernels. And on
> >> these builds excessive logging, at times because of a pinned page,
> >> causing the watchdog timeouts, is the problem.
> >
> > OK, I see but I still believe that the debugging might be useful
> > especially when the owner is not really obvious from the page state.
> > I also agree that if the output is swapping the logs then the situation
> > is not really great either. Would something like the below work for your
> > situation?
> >
> > MAGIC_NUMBER would need to be somehow figured but I would start with 10
> > or so.
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> > index b44d4c7ba73b..3da5c434fb77 100644
> > --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> > +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> > @@ -1299,6 +1299,8 @@ do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> > LIST_HEAD(source);
> >
> > for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++) {
> > + int dumped_page = MAGIC_NUMBER;
> > +
> > if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
> > continue;
> > page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> > @@ -1344,7 +1346,10 @@ do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> >
> > } else {
> > pr_warn("failed to isolate pfn %lx\n", pfn);
> > - dump_page(page, "isolation failed");
> > + if (dumped_page--) {
> > + dump_page(page, "isolation failed");
> > + dumped_page = true;
> > + }
> > }
> > put_page(page);
> > }
> > @@ -1372,10 +1377,14 @@ do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> > ret = migrate_pages(&source, alloc_migration_target, NULL,
> > (unsigned long)&mtc, MIGRATE_SYNC, MR_MEMORY_HOTPLUG);
> > if (ret) {
> > + int dumped_page = MAGIC_NUMBER;
> > +
> > list_for_each_entry(page, &source, lru) {
> > pr_warn("migrating pfn %lx failed ret:%d ",
> > page_to_pfn(page), ret);
> > - dump_page(page, "migration failure");
> > + if (dumped_page--) {
> > + dump_page(page, "migration failure");
> > + }
> > }
> > putback_movable_pages(&source);
> > }
> >
>
> These are working. Rate limiting these logs with default rate limit
> interval and burst also helping me.
Whatever suits you better. I do not have any preference wrt rate
limiting. Feel free to reuse the above.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists