[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACYkzJ5t3McRMmCDQwRXD2n=1QLsgWWOFfJ_iXGGYP5yqorsEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:09:33 +0100
From: KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Security Module list
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...omium.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/3] bpf: Add a selftest for bpf_ima_inode_hash
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 5:29 AM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 7:16 AM KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>
> >
[...]
>
> > +cleanup() {
> > + local tmp_dir="$1"
> > + local mount_img="${tmp_dir}/test.img"
> > + local mount_dir="${tmp_dir}/mnt"
> > +
> > + local loop_devices=$(losetup -j ${mount_img} -O NAME --noheadings)
>
> libbpf and kernel-patches CIs are using BusyBox environment which has
> losetup that doesn't support -j option. Is there some way to work
> around that? What we have is this:
>
> BusyBox v1.31.1 () multi-call binary.
>
> Usage: losetup [-rP] [-o OFS] {-f|LOOPDEV} FILE: associate loop devices
>
> losetup -c LOOPDEV: reread file size
>
> losetup -d LOOPDEV: disassociate
>
> losetup -a: show status
I can try to grep and parse the status output as a fallback. Will send another
fix.
- KP
>
> losetup -f: show next free loop device
>
> -o OFS Start OFS bytes into FILE
>
> -P Scan for partitions
>
> -r Read-only
>
> -f Show/use next free loop device
>
>
> > + for loop_dev in "${loop_devices}"; do
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists