lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 27 Nov 2020 13:22:28 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

On Fri, 27 Nov 2020, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 10:16 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 16:34, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> >>
> >> rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
> >> by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
> >> callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.
> >>
> >> This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
> >> structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
> >> here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
> >> device.
> >>
> >> While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
> >> and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
> >> can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
> >> there to exist a corresponding unregister function.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> >> ---
> >>  .../driver-api/driver-model/devres.rst        |  1 +
> >>  arch/alpha/kernel/rtc.c                       |  2 +-
> >>  drivers/mfd/menelaus.c                        |  2 +-
> >
> >
> > This patch should have been sent to and Acked by MFD too.
> >
> 
> Sorry Lee, I missed the fact that there were changes outside of
> drivers/rtc/. Other than skipping the MFD maintainer - do you see
> anything wrong in that bit?

No real harm done.

The patch looks fine from an MFD standpoint.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists