linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftest/x86/signal: Include test cases for validating sigaltstack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201127173229.GA13262@zn.tnic>
Date:   Fri, 27 Nov 2020 18:32:29 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To:     "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, luto@...nel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, len.brown@...el.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
        hjl.tools@...il.com, Dave.Martin@....com, mpe@...erman.id.au,
        tony.luck@...el.com, ravi.v.shankar@...el.com,
        libc-alpha@...rceware.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftest/x86/signal: Include test cases for
 validating sigaltstack

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 11:02:37AM -0800, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> +static void test_sigaltstack(void *altstack, unsigned long size)
> +{
> +	if (setup_altstack(altstack, size))
> +		err(1, "sigaltstack()");
> +
> +	sigalrm_expected = (size > at_minstack_size) ? true : false;
> +
> +	sethandler(SIGSEGV, sigsegv, 0);
> +	sethandler(SIGALRM, sigalrm, SA_ONSTACK);
> +
> +	if (sigsetjmp(jmpbuf, 1) == 0) {
> +		printf("[RUN]\tTest an %s sigaltstack\n",

[RUN]   Test an enough sigaltstack

That's not english, pls try again.

[OK]    SIGALRM signal expectedly delivered.

What is "expectedly delivered"?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg