[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <97e577a0-50f5-3ade-a377-7479f0f1c890@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 11:45:02 -0600
From: Brian King <brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@...ux.ibm.com>,
james.bottomley@...senpartnership.com
Cc: martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
brking@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] ibmvfc: add vhost fields and defaults for MQ
enablement
On 11/25/20 7:48 PM, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.h b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.h
> index 9d58cfd774d3..8225bdbb127e 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,11 @@
> #define IBMVFC_DEFAULT_LOG_LEVEL 2
> #define IBMVFC_MAX_CDB_LEN 16
> #define IBMVFC_CLS3_ERROR 0
> +#define IBMVFC_MQ 0
Given that IBMVFC_MQ is getting set to 0 here, that means mq_enabled is also
always zero, so am I correct that a lot of this code being added is not
yet capable of being executed?
> +#define IBMVFC_SCSI_CHANNELS 0
Similar comment here...
> +#define IBMVFC_SCSI_HW_QUEUES 1
I don't see any subsequent patches in this series that would ever result
in nr_hw_queues getting set to anything other than 1. Is that future work
planned or am I missing something?
> +#define IBMVFC_MIG_NO_SUB_TO_CRQ 0
> +#define IBMVFC_MIG_NO_N_TO_M 0
>
> /*
> * Ensure we have resources for ERP and initialization:
> @@ -826,6 +831,10 @@ struct ibmvfc_host {
> int delay_init;
> int scan_complete;
> int logged_in;
> + int mq_enabled;
> + int using_channels;
> + int do_enquiry;
> + int client_scsi_channels;
> int aborting_passthru;
> int events_to_log;
> #define IBMVFC_AE_LINKUP 0x0001
>
--
Brian King
Power Linux I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists