lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:41:25 +0900 From: Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon2@...il.com> To: krzk@...nel.org Cc: Krzysztof Opasiak <k.opasiak@...sung.com>, linux-nfc@...ts.01.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] nfc: s3fwrn5: use signed integer for parsing GPIO numbers On 11/27/20, Bongsu Jeon <bs.jeon87@...il.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 2:06 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 12:33:37AM +0900, bongsu.jeon2@...il.com wrote: >> > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> >> > >> > GPIOs - as returned by of_get_named_gpio() and used by the gpiolib - >> > are >> > signed integers, where negative number indicates error. The return >> > value of of_get_named_gpio() should not be assigned to an unsigned int >> > because in case of !CONFIG_GPIOLIB such number would be a valid GPIO. >> > >> > Fixes: c04c674fadeb ("nfc: s3fwrn5: Add driver for Samsung S3FWRN5 NFC >> > Chip") >> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> >> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> >> >> Why do you send my patch? >> > > I think that your patch should be applied before refactoring for this > driver. > So, I applied your patch to net-next branch and included your patch at > my patch list. > Is this the wrong process? > Sorry to confuse you. I found your patch when i updated my workspace using git pull. >> Best regards, >> Krzysztof >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists