[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <160650835295.2717324.6223337132204167294@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 12:19:12 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] clk: fix redefinition of clk_prepare on MIPS with HAVE_LEGACY_CLK
Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2020-11-25 06:15:05)
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 04:11:31PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > Ok so this patch isn't necessary then?
>
> For this particular build failure - it is not necessary anymore.
>
> However there might more of such errors - just not discovered yet. Also,
> the clock bulk API has such ifdefs so it kind of symmetrical and
> consistent approach.
>
Ok. Patches always welcome.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists