[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201128175850.19484-1-wenyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 01:58:50 +0800
From: Wen Yang <wenyang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>, ebiederm@...ssion.com
Cc: Wen Yang <wenyang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] proc: add locking checks in proc_inode_is_dead
The proc_inode_is_dead function might race with __unhash_process.
This will result in a whole bunch of stale proc entries being cached.
To prevent that, add the required locking.
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wenyang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
---
fs/proc/base.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 1bc9bcd..59720bc 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -1994,7 +1994,13 @@ static int pid_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags)
static inline bool proc_inode_is_dead(struct inode *inode)
{
- return !proc_pid(inode)->tasks[PIDTYPE_PID].first;
+ bool has_task;
+
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ has_task = pid_has_task(proc_pid(inode), PIDTYPE_PID);
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+
+ return !has_task;
}
int pid_delete_dentry(const struct dentry *dentry)
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists