linux-kernel - Re: ACK: [PATCH 1/1] efi/efi_test: read RuntimeServicesSupported

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8d4133d9-3d4b-ee3c-7bb0-927c14d37961@canonical.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Nov 2020 19:38:13 +0000
From:   Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc:     Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de>,
        Ivan Hu <ivan.hu@...onical.com>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        fwts-devel@...ts.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: ACK: [PATCH 1/1] efi/efi_test: read RuntimeServicesSupported

On 27/11/2020 19:29, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 20:28, Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 27/11/2020 19:20, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>> Since the UEFI 2.8A specification the UEFI enabled firmware provides a
>>> configuration table EFI_RT_PROPERTIES_TABLE which indicates which runtime
>>> services are enabled. The EFI stub reads this table and saves the value of
>>> the field RuntimeServicesSupported internally.
>>>
>>> The Firmware Test Suite requires the value to determine if UEFI runtime
>>> services are correctly implemented.
>>>
>>> With this patch an IOCTL call is provided to read the value of the field
>>> RuntimeServicesSupported, e.g.
>>>
>>>     #define EFI_RUNTIME_GET_SUPPORTED_MASK \
>>>             _IOR('p', 0x0C, unsigned int)
>>>     unsigned int mask;
>>>     fd = open("/dev/efi_test", O_RDWR);
>>>     ret = ioctl(fd, EFI_RUNTIME_GET_SUPPORTED_MASK, &mask);
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>>  drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.h |  3 +++
>>>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.c
>>> index ddf9eae396fe..47d67bb0a516 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.c
>>> @@ -663,6 +663,19 @@ static long efi_runtime_query_capsulecaps(unsigned long arg)
>>>       return rv;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +static long efi_runtime_get_supported_mask(unsigned long arg)
>>> +{
>>> +     unsigned int __user *supported_mask;
>>> +     int rv = 0;
>>> +
>>> +     supported_mask = (unsigned int *)arg;
>>> +
>>> +     if (put_user(efi.runtime_supported_mask, supported_mask))
>>> +             rv = -EFAULT;
>>> +
>>> +     return rv;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  static long efi_test_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>>>                                                       unsigned long arg)
>>>  {
>>> @@ -699,6 +712,9 @@ static long efi_test_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>>>
>>>       case EFI_RUNTIME_RESET_SYSTEM:
>>>               return efi_runtime_reset_system(arg);
>>> +
>>> +     case EFI_RUNTIME_GET_SUPPORTED_MASK:
>>> +             return efi_runtime_get_supported_mask(arg);
>>>       }
>>>
>>>       return -ENOTTY;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.h b/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.h
>>> index f2446aa1c2e3..117349e57993 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.h
>>> @@ -118,4 +118,7 @@ struct efi_resetsystem {
>>>  #define EFI_RUNTIME_RESET_SYSTEM \
>>>       _IOW('p', 0x0B, struct efi_resetsystem)
>>>
>>> +#define EFI_RUNTIME_GET_SUPPORTED_MASK \
>>> +     _IOR('p', 0x0C, unsigned int)
>>> +
>>>  #endif /* _DRIVERS_FIRMWARE_EFI_TEST_H_ */
>>> --
>>> 2.29.2
>>>
>>
>> Looks good to me. Thanks Heinrich.
>>
>> The EFI driver needs to be also updated in the linux kernel - has that
>> fix been submitted or do you require the fwts team to do that?

Oops. It's been a lot week :-(

>>
> 
> This /is/ the EFI driver.
> 
> I'll take this as an acked-by but I'd like Ivan to chime in as well.
> 
+1