| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20201128152124.24d88b36@archlinux>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 15:21:24 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] iio: adc: at91_adc: merge at91_adc_probe_dt
back in at91_adc_probe
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 15:06:52 +0100
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com> wrote:
> at91_adc_probe_dt is now small enough to be merged back in at91_adc_probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
This proved a little more interesting to apply, but I think that is just
down to Alexandru having already made the match_data related change.
Please check I got it right!
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> index 83539422b704..347464844263 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> @@ -833,70 +833,6 @@ static int at91_adc_probe_dt_ts(struct device_node *node,
> }
> }
>
> -static int at91_adc_probe_dt(struct iio_dev *idev,
> - struct platform_device *pdev)
> -{
> - struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(idev);
> - struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> - int ret;
> - u32 prop;
> - char *s;
> -
> - st->caps = (struct at91_adc_caps *)
> - of_match_device(at91_adc_dt_ids, &pdev->dev)->data;
> -
> - st->use_external = of_property_read_bool(node, "atmel,adc-use-external-triggers");
> -
> - if (of_property_read_u32(node, "atmel,adc-channels-used", &prop)) {
> - dev_err(&idev->dev, "Missing adc-channels-used property in the DT.\n");
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto error_ret;
> - }
> - st->channels_mask = prop;
> -
> - st->sleep_mode = of_property_read_bool(node, "atmel,adc-sleep-mode");
> -
> - if (of_property_read_u32(node, "atmel,adc-startup-time", &prop)) {
> - dev_err(&idev->dev, "Missing adc-startup-time property in the DT.\n");
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto error_ret;
> - }
> - st->startup_time = prop;
> -
> - prop = 0;
> - of_property_read_u32(node, "atmel,adc-sample-hold-time", &prop);
> - st->sample_hold_time = prop;
> -
> - if (of_property_read_u32(node, "atmel,adc-vref", &prop)) {
> - dev_err(&idev->dev, "Missing adc-vref property in the DT.\n");
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto error_ret;
> - }
> - st->vref_mv = prop;
> -
> - st->res = st->caps->high_res_bits;
> - if (st->caps->low_res_bits &&
> - !of_property_read_string(node, "atmel,adc-use-res", (const char **)&s)
> - && !strcmp(s, "lowres"))
> - st->res = st->caps->low_res_bits;
> -
> - dev_info(&idev->dev, "Resolution used: %u bits\n", st->res);
> -
> - st->registers = &st->caps->registers;
> - st->num_channels = st->caps->num_channels;
> -
> - /* Check if touchscreen is supported. */
> - if (st->caps->has_ts)
> - return at91_adc_probe_dt_ts(node, st, &idev->dev);
> - else
> - dev_info(&idev->dev, "not support touchscreen in the adc compatible string.\n");
> -
> - return 0;
> -
> -error_ret:
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> static const struct iio_info at91_adc_info = {
> .read_raw = &at91_adc_read_raw,
> };
> @@ -1062,10 +998,12 @@ static void at91_ts_unregister(struct at91_adc_state *st)
> static int at91_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> unsigned int prsc, mstrclk, ticks, adc_clk, adc_clk_khz, shtim;
> + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> int ret;
> struct iio_dev *idev;
> struct at91_adc_state *st;
> - u32 reg;
> + u32 reg, prop;
> + char *s;
>
> idev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct at91_adc_state));
> if (!idev)
> @@ -1073,9 +1011,52 @@ static int at91_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> st = iio_priv(idev);
>
> - ret = at91_adc_probe_dt(idev, pdev);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + st->caps = (struct at91_adc_caps *)
> + of_match_device(at91_adc_dt_ids, &pdev->dev)->data;
> +
> + st->use_external = of_property_read_bool(node, "atmel,adc-use-external-triggers");
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "atmel,adc-channels-used", &prop)) {
> + dev_err(&idev->dev, "Missing adc-channels-used property in the DT.\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + st->channels_mask = prop;
> +
> + st->sleep_mode = of_property_read_bool(node, "atmel,adc-sleep-mode");
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "atmel,adc-startup-time", &prop)) {
> + dev_err(&idev->dev, "Missing adc-startup-time property in the DT.\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + st->startup_time = prop;
> +
> + prop = 0;
> + of_property_read_u32(node, "atmel,adc-sample-hold-time", &prop);
> + st->sample_hold_time = prop;
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "atmel,adc-vref", &prop)) {
> + dev_err(&idev->dev, "Missing adc-vref property in the DT.\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + st->vref_mv = prop;
> +
> + st->res = st->caps->high_res_bits;
> + if (st->caps->low_res_bits &&
> + !of_property_read_string(node, "atmel,adc-use-res", (const char **)&s)
> + && !strcmp(s, "lowres"))
> + st->res = st->caps->low_res_bits;
> +
> + dev_info(&idev->dev, "Resolution used: %u bits\n", st->res);
> +
> + st->registers = &st->caps->registers;
> + st->num_channels = st->caps->num_channels;
> +
> + /* Check if touchscreen is supported. */
> + if (st->caps->has_ts) {
> + ret = at91_adc_probe_dt_ts(node, st, &idev->dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, idev);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists