| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <d3a3c534-ae62-7703-9740-f3664c63459c@fb.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 20:15:49 -0800
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 07/13] bpf: Add BPF_FETCH field / create
atomic_fetch_add instruction
On 11/27/20 9:57 AM, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> This value can be set in bpf_insn.imm, for BPF_ATOMIC instructions,
> in order to have the previous value of the atomically-modified memory
> location loaded into the src register after an atomic op is carried
> out.
>
> Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 4 ++++
> include/linux/filter.h | 9 +++++++++
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 3 +++
> kernel/bpf/core.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> kernel/bpf/disasm.c | 7 +++++++
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> tools/include/linux/filter.h | 10 ++++++++++
> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 3 +++
> 8 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index 7c47ad70ddb4..d3cd45bcd0c1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -827,6 +827,10 @@ static int emit_atomic(u8 **pprog, u8 atomic_op,
> /* lock *(u32/u64*)(dst_reg + off) <op>= src_reg */
> EMIT1(simple_alu_opcodes[atomic_op]);
> break;
> + case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH:
> + /* src_reg = atomic_fetch_add(*(dst_reg + off), src_reg); */
> + EMIT2(0x0F, 0xC1);
> + break;
> default:
> pr_err("bpf_jit: unknown atomic opcode %02x\n", atomic_op);
> return -EFAULT;
> diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
> index ce19988fb312..4e04d0fc454f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/filter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/filter.h
> @@ -270,6 +270,15 @@ static inline bool insn_is_zext(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
> .imm = BPF_ADD })
> #define BPF_STX_XADD BPF_ATOMIC_ADD /* alias */
>
> +/* Atomic memory add with fetch, src_reg = atomic_fetch_add(*(dst_reg + off), src_reg); */
> +
> +#define BPF_ATOMIC_FETCH_ADD(SIZE, DST, SRC, OFF) \
> + ((struct bpf_insn) { \
> + .code = BPF_STX | BPF_SIZE(SIZE) | BPF_ATOMIC, \
> + .dst_reg = DST, \
> + .src_reg = SRC, \
> + .off = OFF, \
> + .imm = BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH })
>
> /* Memory store, *(uint *) (dst_reg + off16) = imm32 */
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index d0adc48db43c..025e377e7229 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
> #define BPF_CALL 0x80 /* function call */
> #define BPF_EXIT 0x90 /* function return */
>
> +/* atomic op type fields (stored in immediate) */
> +#define BPF_FETCH 0x01 /* fetch previous value into src reg */
> +
> /* Register numbers */
> enum {
> BPF_REG_0 = 0,
[...]
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index e8b41ccdfb90..cd4c03b25573 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -3602,7 +3602,11 @@ static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_i
> {
> int err;
>
> - if (insn->imm != BPF_ADD) {
> + switch (insn->imm) {
> + case BPF_ADD:
> + case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH:
> + break;
> + default:
> verbose(env, "BPF_ATOMIC uses invalid atomic opcode %02x\n", insn->imm);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -3631,7 +3635,7 @@ static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_i
> is_pkt_reg(env, insn->dst_reg) ||
> is_flow_key_reg(env, insn->dst_reg) ||
> is_sk_reg(env, insn->dst_reg)) {
> - verbose(env, "atomic stores into R%d %s is not allowed\n",
> + verbose(env, "BPF_ATOMIC stores into R%d %s is not allowed\n",
> insn->dst_reg,
> reg_type_str[reg_state(env, insn->dst_reg)->type]);
> return -EACCES;
> @@ -3644,8 +3648,20 @@ static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_i
> return err;
>
> /* check whether we can write into the same memory */
> - return check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
> - BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1, true);
> + err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
> + BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1, true);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + if (!(insn->imm & BPF_FETCH))
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* check and record load of old value into src reg */
> + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, DST_OP);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int __check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
> @@ -9501,12 +9517,6 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
> } else if (class == BPF_STX) {
> enum bpf_reg_type *prev_dst_type, dst_reg_type;
>
> - if (((BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM &&
> - BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_ATOMIC) || insn->imm != 0)) {
> - verbose(env, "BPF_STX uses reserved fields\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC) {
> err = check_atomic(env, env->insn_idx, insn);
> if (err)
> @@ -9515,6 +9525,11 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
> continue;
> }
>
> + if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM && insn->imm != 0) {
"||" here instead of "&&"?
> + verbose(env, "BPF_STX uses reserved fields\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> /* check src1 operand */
> err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP);
> if (err)
> diff --git a/tools/include/linux/filter.h b/tools/include/linux/filter.h
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists