lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 29 Nov 2020 13:57:48 +0200
From:   Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:     linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BISECTED REGRESSION] Broken USB/GPIO on OMAP1 OSK

Hi,

On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 01:51:54AM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> I tried to upgrade my OMAP1 OSK board to v5.9, but the rootfs cannot
> be accessed anymore due to broken USB. It fails to probe with the
> following logs:
> 
> [    9.219940] ohci ohci: cannot find GPIO chip i2c-tps65010, deferring
> [    9.250366] ohci ohci: cannot find GPIO chip i2c-tps65010, deferring
> [    9.731445] ohci ohci: cannot find GPIO chip i2c-tps65010, deferring
> [   10.342102] ohci ohci: cannot find GPIO chip i2c-tps65010, deferring
> [   10.966430] ohci ohci: cannot find GPIO chip i2c-tps65010, deferring
> 
> Bisected to:
> 
> commit 15d157e874437e381643c37a10922388d6e55b29
> Author: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Date:   Mon Jul 20 15:55:24 2020 +0200
> 
>     usb: ohci-omap: Convert to use GPIO descriptors
> 
> I suspect one of the issues is the name "i2c-tps65010" vs "tps65010":
> 
> # cat /sys/devices/platform/omap_i2c.1/i2c-1/i2c-tps65010/gpio/gpiochip208/label
> tps65010
> 
> However changing that in the lookup table still doesn't help much; I got rid
> of the "deferring" message but the USB still doesn't work. So far the only
> workaround I have is to revert the whole commit.

GPIO numbering goes wrong... It's now trying to poke GPIO2.

Also gpiod_set_value_cansleep() probably should be used as tps65010
can sleep.

A.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ