[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAORVsuUez9qteuuqkGpQbU5yXjAFxcpRXGaXnKwqm-hKSKF6NQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 20:34:27 +0100
From: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...oldbits.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ryan Barnett <ryan.barnett@...kwellcollins.com>,
Conrad Ratschan <conrad.ratschan@...kwellcollins.com>,
Hugo Cornelis <hugo.cornelis@...ensium.com>,
Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout.vandecappelle@...ensium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: ksz: pad frame to 64 bytes for transmission
Hi Andrew,
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 5:56 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 11:23:59AM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote:
> > Some ethernet controllers (e.g. TI CPSW) pad the frames to a minimum
> > of 64 bytes before the FCS is appended. This causes an issue with the
> > KSZ tail tag which could not be the last byte before the FCS.
> > Solve this by padding the frame to 64 bytes minus the tail tag size,
> > before the tail tag is added and the frame is passed for transmission.
>
> Hi Jean
>
> what tree is this based on? Have you seen
The patches are based on the latest mainline v5.10-rc5. Is this the
recommended version to submit new patches?
>
> commit 88fda8eefd9a7a7175bf4dad1d02cc0840581111
> Author: Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de>
> Date: Sun Nov 1 21:16:10 2020 +0200
>
> net: dsa: tag_ksz: don't allocate additional memory for padding/tagging
>
> The caller (dsa_slave_xmit) guarantees that the frame length is at least
> ETH_ZLEN and that enough memory for tail tagging is available.
>
I cannot find this commit. Which tree/branch is it from?
Thanks for reviewing,
Jean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists