linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/18] software_node: amend software_node_unregister_node_group() to perform unregistration of array in reverse order to be consistent with software_node_unregister

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201130174728.GR4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:47:28 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc:     Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        devel@...ica.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, bgolaszewski@...libre.com,
        wsa@...nel.org, yong.zhi@...el.com, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
        bingbu.cao@...el.com, tian.shu.qiu@...el.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
        robert.moore@...el.com, erik.kaneda@...el.com, pmladek@...e.com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com,
        linux@...musvillemoes.dk, kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com,
        jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org,
        laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com,
        jorhand@...ux.microsoft.com, kitakar@...il.com,
        heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/18] software_node: amend
 software_node_unregister_node_group() to perform unregistration of array in
 reverse order to be consistent with software_node_unregister_nodes()

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 06:17:16PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> Thank you for the patch.
> 
> The subject line is very long. We try to keep it within a 72 characters
> limit in the kernel. That can be a challenge sometimes, and expections
> can be accepted, but this one is reaaaally long.
> 
> (The same comment holds for other patches in the series)

+1.

> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:31:17PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
> > To maintain consistency with software_node_unregister_nodes(), reverse
> > the order in which the software_node_unregister_node_group() function
> > unregisters nodes.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
> 
> I"d squash this with the previous patch to avoid introducing an
> inconsistency.

It's different to previous. It touches not complementary API, but different
one. However, I would follow your comment about documenting the behaviour of
these two APIs as well…

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko