[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35052891-4d32-19f0-e991-2aad009917e9@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:19:09 +0100
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, jiri@...dia.com,
idosch@...dia.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mlxsw: switch from 'pci_' to 'dma_' API
Le 29/11/2020 à 22:46, Heiner Kallweit a écrit :
> Am 29.11.2020 um 22:17 schrieb Christophe JAILLET:
>> @@ -1817,17 +1817,17 @@ static int mlxsw_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>> goto err_pci_request_regions;
>> }
>>
>> - err = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
>> + err = dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
>
> Using dma_set_mask_and_coherent() would be better here.
>
>> if (!err) {
>> - err = pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
>> + err = dma_set_coherent_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
>> if (err) {
>
> This check isn't needed, see comment at definition of
> dma_set_mask_and_coherent().
>
Hi,
Correct, but I didn't want to mix several things in the same commit.
This one is dedicated to automatically generated changes done with
coccinelle.
I plan to have another set of such clean-ups once "wrappers in
include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h are gone"
However, if it is prefered to have only one patch, I can resubmit.
CJ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists