[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201130184041.GB28735@kozik-lap>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 20:40:41 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon2@...il.com>
Cc: linux-nfc@...ts.01.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] nfc: s3fwrn5: reduce the EN_WAIT_TIME
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 09:02:30PM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
> From: Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@...sung.com>
>
> The delay of 20ms is enough to enable and
> wake up the Samsung's nfc chip.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/i2c.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
It's really not easy to work with your way of sending the patches.
I am sorry but you have to adjust your style to the style of reviewers
and the entire community.
1. Again, you ignored/dropped my Ack.
2. I asked you to send all patches referencing each other, which you can
achieve without any effort with git format-patch and send-email or
with in-reply-to.
Seriously, these tools work properly by default! You have to break
them on purpose - so stop. Now, all your patches are scattered over
my mailbox. They are all over mailing list:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/?q=bongsu.jeon2%40gmail.com
Browsing this patchset is uncomfortable. It's a pain.
Please, work on your workflow. Get help in that - there are plenty of
open-source contributors in Samsung. Ask them how to do it. If you
cannot, read the mailing lists and see how others do it.
Recent example, one of thousands:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20201130131047.2648960-1-daniel@0x0f.com/T/#m4a9ed644869b8018b8286a6b229012278141cb66
1. It comes with a cover letter,
2. All emails are properly linked with each other (scroll to the bottom).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists