linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v15 05/26] x86/cet/shstk: Add Kconfig option for user-mode Shadow Stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Nov 2020 11:56:02 -0800
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     yu-cheng.yu@...el.com
Cc:     Dave.Martin@....com, arnd@...db.de, bp@...en8.de,
        bsingharora@...il.com, corbet@....net, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        esyr@...hat.com, fweimer@...hat.com, gorcunov@...il.com,
        hjl.tools@...il.com, hpa@...or.com, jannh@...gle.com,
        keescook@...omium.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, luto@...nel.org,
        mike.kravetz@...cle.com, mingo@...hat.com, nadav.amit@...il.com,
        oleg@...hat.com, pavel@....cz, pengfei.xu@...el.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, ravi.v.shankar@...el.com,
        rdunlap@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com, weijiang.yang@...el.com,
        x86@...nel.org, Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 05/26] x86/cet/shstk: Add Kconfig option for user-mode
 Shadow Stack

In response to https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201110162211.9207-6-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com/.

Hi Yu-cheng,
This feature reminds me very much of
ARCH_SUPPORTS_SHADOW_CALL_STACK/CC_HAVE_SHADOW_CALL_STACK implemented in
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=5287569a790d2546a06db07e391bf84b8bd6cf51.

Do you think it would be worthwhile to share the same config name between x86
and aarch64?

(Though, it seems on x86 there will be a distinction between kernel mode and
user mode configs, if I understand correctly?)