[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdmfEY6fnNFUUzLvN9bKyeTt7OMc-Uvx=YqTuMR2BuD5XA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 12:12:39 -0800
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
x86@...r.kernel.org, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [stable 4.9] PANIC: double fault, error_code: 0x0 - clang boot
failed on x86_64
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 10:38 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Is the mainline 4.9 tree supposed to work with clang? I didn't think
> that upstream effort started until 4.19 or so.
(For historical records, separate from the initial bug report that
started this thread)
I consider 785f11aa595b ("kbuild: Add better clang cross build
support") to be the starting point of a renewed effort to upstream
clang support. 785f11aa595b landed in v4.12-rc1. I think most patches
landed between there and 4.15 (would have been my guess). From there,
support was backported to 4.14, 4.9, and 4.4 for x86_64 and aarch64.
We still have CI coverage of those branches+arches with Clang today.
Pixel 2 shipped with 4.4+clang, Pixel 3 and 3a with 4.9+clang, Pixel 4
and 4a with 4.14+clang. CrOS has also shipped clang built kernels
since 4.4+.
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists