Message-ID: <fba097b3-6c61-c1ad-2928-3cb55bff6d19@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Nov 2020 23:20:55 +0000
From:   Dan Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
To:     Jean-Michel Hautbois <jeanmichel.hautbois@...asonboard.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devel@...ica.org
Cc:     rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, bgolaszewski@...libre.com,
        wsa@...nel.org, yong.zhi@...el.com, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
        bingbu.cao@...el.com, tian.shu.qiu@...el.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
        robert.moore@...el.com, erik.kaneda@...el.com, pmladek@...e.com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com,
        linux@...musvillemoes.dk, kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com,
        jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org,
        laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com,
        jorhand@...ux.microsoft.com, kitakar@...il.com,
        heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] ipu3: Add driver for dummy INT3472 ACPI device

Hi Jean-Michel

On 30/11/2020 16:17, Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote:
>> We're guessing as to the exact meaning of the function byte, but I
>> conclude they're something like this:
>>
>> 0x00 - probably a reset GPIO
>> 0x01 - regulator for the sensor
>> 0x0c - regulator for the sensor
>> 0x0b - regulator again, but for a VCM or EEPROM
> Is it possible that the ad5823 would be here, and controled by this bit ?

That's one of the devices Laurent guessed might be there yes; when that
GPIO line is toggled it causes an extra device to show on the i2c-bus,
but the ACPI table doesn't define an I2CSerialBusV2 for it. Instead it's
rolled under the sensor's entry, there's a second entry in _CRS for the
sensor that matches the address of the new device:


            Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized)  // _CRS: Current Resource Settings
            {
                Name (SBUF, ResourceTemplate ()
                {
                    I2cSerialBusV2 (0x0036, ControllerInitiated, 0x00061A80,
                        AddressingMode7Bit, "\\_SB.PCI0.I2C2",
                        0x00, ResourceConsumer, , Exclusive,
                        )
                    I2cSerialBusV2 (0x000C, ControllerInitiated, 0x00061A80,
                        AddressingMode7Bit, "\\_SB.PCI0.I2C2",
                        0x00, ResourceConsumer, , Exclusive,
                        )
                })
                Return (SBUF) /* \_SB_.PCI0.CAM0._CRS.SBUF */
            }

So that's another thing we need to work on. At the moment it doesn't
exist as far as the kernel is concerned.

>> 0x0d - privacy led (only one we're totally confident of since we can see
>>        it happen!)
>>
>> After much internal debate I decided to write this as a standalone
>> acpi_driver. Alternative options we considered:
>>
>> 1. Squash all this into the cio2-bridge code, which I did originally write
>> but decided I didn't like.
>> 2. Extend the existing tps68470 mfd driver...they share an ACPI ID so this
>> kinda makes sense, but ultimately given there is no actual physical
>> tps68470 in the scenario this patch handles I decided I didn't like this
>> either.
>>
>>  MAINTAINERS                            |   7 +
>>  drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Kconfig   |  14 +
>>  drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Makefile  |   1 +
>>  drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.c | 381 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.h |  96 +++++++
>>  5 files changed, 499 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.c
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.h
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index 188559a0a610..d73471f9c2a3 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -8753,6 +8753,13 @@ L:	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
>>  S:	Maintained
>>  F:	drivers/crypto/inside-secure/
>>  
>> +INT3472 ACPI DEVICE DRIVER
>> +M:	Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
>> +L:	linux-media@...r.kernel.org
>> +S:	Maintained
>> +F:	drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.c
>> +F:	drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.h
>> +
>>  INTEGRITY MEASUREMENT ARCHITECTURE (IMA)
>>  M:	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
>>  M:	Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Kconfig b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Kconfig
>> index 2b3350d042be..9dd3b280f821 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Kconfig
>> @@ -34,3 +34,17 @@ config CIO2_BRIDGE
>>  		- Dell 7285
>>  
>>  	  If in doubt, say N here.
>> +
>> +config INT3472
>> +	tristate "INT3472 Dummy ACPI Device Driver"
>> +	depends on VIDEO_IPU3_CIO2
>> +	depends on ACPI && REGULATOR && GPIOLIB
>> +	help
>> +	  This module provides an ACPI driver for INT3472 devices that do not
>> +	  represent an actual physical tps68470 device.
>> +
>> +	  Say Y here if your device is a detachable / hybrid laptop that comes
>> +	  with Windows installed by the OEM.
>> +	  The module will be called int3472.
>> +
>> +	  If in doubt, say N here.
> Is there any issue if the tps68470 driver is also selected and probed ?
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Makefile b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Makefile
>> index 933777e6ea8a..2285947b2bd2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Makefile
>> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_IPU3_CIO2) += ipu3-cio2.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_INT3472) += int3472.o
>>  
>>  ipu3-cio2-y += ipu3-cio2-main.o
>>  ipu3-cio2-$(CONFIG_CIO2_BRIDGE) += cio2-bridge.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.c b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..6b0be75f7f35
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,381 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/* Author: Dan Scally <djrscally@...il.com> */
>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
>> +#include <linux/gpio/machine.h>
>> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/list.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/regulator/driver.h>
>> +
>> +#include "int3472.h"
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * The regulators have to have .ops to be valid, but the only ops we actually
>> + * support are .enable and .disable which are handled via .ena_gpiod. Pass an
>> + * empty struct to clear the check without lying about capabilities.
>> + */
>> +static const struct regulator_ops int3472_gpio_regulator_ops = { 0 };
>> +
>> +static int int3472_map_gpio_to_sensor(struct int3472_device *int3472,
>> +				      struct acpi_resource *ares, char *func)
>> +{
>> +	char *path = ares->data.gpio.resource_source.string_ptr;
>> +	struct gpiod_lookup table_entry;
>> +	struct acpi_device *adev;
>> +	acpi_handle handle;
>> +	acpi_status status;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	/* Make sure we don't overflow, and leave room for a terminator */
>> +	if (int3472->n_sensor_gpios >= INT3472_MAX_SENSOR_GPIOS) {
>> +		dev_warn(&int3472->sensor->dev, "Too many GPIOs mapped\n");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Fetch ACPI handle for the GPIO chip  */
>> +	status = acpi_get_handle(NULL, path, &handle);
>> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	ret = acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +	table_entry = (struct gpiod_lookup)GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX(acpi_dev_name(adev),
>> +							   ares->data.gpio.pin_table[0],
>> +							   func, 0, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH);
>> +
>> +	memcpy(&int3472->gpios.table[int3472->n_sensor_gpios], &table_entry,
>> +	       sizeof(table_entry));
>> +	int3472->n_sensor_gpios++;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct int3472_sensor_regulator_map *
>> +int3472_get_sensor_supply_map(struct int3472_device *int3472)
>> +{
>> +	struct int3472_sensor_regulator_map *ret;
>> +	union acpi_object *obj;
>> +	unsigned int i;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Sensor modules seem to be identified by a unique string. We use that
>> +	 * to make sure we pass the right device and supply names to the new
>> +	 * regulator's consumer_supplies
>> +	 */
>> +	obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(int3472->sensor->handle,
>> +				      &cio2_sensor_module_guid, 0x00,
>> +				      0x01, NULL, ACPI_TYPE_STRING);
>> +
>> +	if (!obj) {
>> +		dev_err(&int3472->sensor->dev,
>> +			"Failed to get sensor module string from _DSM\n");
>> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (obj->string.type != ACPI_TYPE_STRING) {
>> +		dev_err(&int3472->sensor->dev,
>> +			"Sensor _DSM returned a non-string value\n");
>> +		ret = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> +		goto out_free_obj;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(int3472_sensor_regulator_maps); i++) {
>> +		if (!strcmp(int3472_sensor_regulator_maps[i].sensor_module_name,
>> +			    obj->string.pointer)) {
>> +			ret = &int3472_sensor_regulator_maps[i];
>> +			goto out_free_obj;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +out_free_obj:
>> +	ACPI_FREE(obj);
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int int3472_register_regulator(struct int3472_device *int3472,
>> +				      struct acpi_resource *ares)
>> +{
>> +	char *path = ares->data.gpio.resource_source.string_ptr;
>> +	struct int3472_sensor_regulator_map *regulator_map;
>> +	struct regulator_init_data init_data = { };
>> +	struct int3472_gpio_regulator *regulator;
>> +	struct regulator_config cfg = { };
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * We lookup supply names from machine specific tables, based on a
>> +	 * unique identifier in the sensor's _DSM
>> +	 */
>> +	regulator_map = int3472_get_sensor_supply_map(int3472);
>> +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(regulator_map)) {
>> +		dev_err(&int3472->sensor->dev,
>> +			"Found no supplies defined for this sensor\n");
>> +		return PTR_ERR(regulator_map);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (int3472->n_regulators >= regulator_map->n_supplies) {
>> +		dev_err(&int3472->sensor->dev,
>> +			"All known supplies are already mapped\n");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	init_data.supply_regulator = NULL;
>> +	init_data.constraints.valid_ops_mask = REGULATOR_CHANGE_STATUS;
>> +	init_data.num_consumer_supplies = 1;
>> +	init_data.consumer_supplies = &regulator_map->supplies[int3472->n_regulators];
>> +
>> +	regulator = kmalloc(sizeof(*regulator), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!regulator)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	snprintf(regulator->regulator_name, GPIO_REGULATOR_NAME_LENGTH,
>> +		 "gpio-regulator-%d", int3472->n_regulators);
>> +	snprintf(regulator->supply_name, GPIO_REGULATOR_SUPPLY_NAME_LENGTH,
>> +		 "supply-%d", int3472->n_regulators);
>> +
>> +	regulator->rdesc = INT3472_REGULATOR(regulator->regulator_name,
>> +					     regulator->supply_name,
>> +					     int3472->n_regulators,
>> +					     &int3472_gpio_regulator_ops);
>> +
>> +	regulator->gpio = acpi_get_gpiod(path, ares->data.gpio.pin_table[0]);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(regulator->gpio)) {
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(regulator->gpio);
>> +		goto err_free_regulator;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	cfg.dev = &int3472->adev->dev;
>> +	cfg.init_data = &init_data;
>> +	cfg.ena_gpiod = regulator->gpio;
>> +
>> +	regulator->rdev = regulator_register(&regulator->rdesc, &cfg);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(regulator->rdev)) {
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(regulator->rdev);
>> +		goto err_free_gpio;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	list_add(&regulator->list, &int3472->regulators);
>> +	int3472->n_regulators++;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +
>> +err_free_gpio:
>> +	gpiod_put(regulator->gpio);
>> +err_free_regulator:
>> +	kfree(regulator);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int int3472_handle_gpio_resources(struct acpi_resource *ares,
>> +					 void *data)
>> +{
>> +	struct int3472_device *int3472 = data;
>> +	union acpi_object *obj;
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +	if (ares->type != ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_GPIO ||
>> +	    ares->data.gpio.connection_type != ACPI_RESOURCE_GPIO_TYPE_IO)
>> +		return EINVAL; /* Deliberately positive */
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * n_gpios + 2 because the index of this _DSM function is 1-based and
>> +	 * the first function is just a count.
>> +	 */
>> +	obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(int3472->adev->handle,
>> +				      &int3472_gpio_guid, 0x00,
>> +				      int3472->n_gpios + 2,
>> +				      NULL, ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER);
>> +
>> +	if (!obj) {
>> +		dev_warn(&int3472->adev->dev,
>> +			 "No _DSM entry for this GPIO pin\n");
>> +		return ENODEV;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	switch (obj->integer.value & 0xff) { /* low byte holds type data */
>> +	case 0x00: /* Purpose unclear, possibly a reset GPIO pin */
>> +		ret = int3472_map_gpio_to_sensor(int3472, ares, "reset");
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			dev_warn(&int3472->adev->dev,
>> +				 "Failed to map reset pin to sensor\n");
>> +
>> +		break;
>> +	case 0x01: /* Power regulators (we think) */
>> +	case 0x0c:
>> +		ret = int3472_register_regulator(int3472, ares);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			dev_warn(&int3472->adev->dev,
>> +				 "Failed to map regulator to sensor\n");
>> +
>> +		break;
>> +	case 0x0b: /* Power regulators, but to a device separate to sensor */
>> +		ret = int3472_register_regulator(int3472, ares);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			dev_warn(&int3472->adev->dev,
>> +				 "Failed to map regulator to sensor\n");
>> +
>> +		break;
>> +	case 0x0d: /* Indicator LEDs */
>> +		ret = int3472_map_gpio_to_sensor(int3472, ares, "indicator-led");
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			dev_warn(&int3472->adev->dev,
>> +				 "Failed to map indicator led to sensor\n");
>> +
>> +		break;
>> +	default:
>> +		/* if we've gotten here, we're not sure what they are yet */
>> +		dev_warn(&int3472->adev->dev,
>> +			 "GPIO type 0x%llx unknown; the sensor may not work\n",
>> +			 (obj->integer.value & 0xff));
>> +		ret = EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	int3472->n_gpios++;
>> +	ACPI_FREE(obj);
>> +	return abs(ret);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void int3472_parse_crs(struct int3472_device *int3472)
>> +{
>> +	struct list_head resource_list;
>> +
>> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
>> +
>> +	acpi_dev_get_resources(int3472->adev, &resource_list,
>> +			       int3472_handle_gpio_resources, int3472);
>> +
>> +	acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
>> +	gpiod_add_lookup_table(&int3472->gpios);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int int3472_add(struct acpi_device *adev)
>> +{
>> +	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
>> +	struct int3472_device *int3472;
>> +	struct int3472_cldb cldb;
>> +	union acpi_object *obj;
>> +	acpi_status status;
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * This driver is only intended to support "dummy" INT3472 devices
>> +	 * which appear in ACPI designed for Windows. These are distinguishable
>> +	 * from INT3472 entries representing an actual tps68470 PMIC through
>> +	 * the presence of a CLDB buffer with a particular value set.
>> +	 */
>> +	status = acpi_evaluate_object(adev->handle, "CLDB", NULL, &buffer);
>> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +	obj = buffer.pointer;
>> +	if (!obj) {
>> +		dev_err(&adev->dev, "ACPI device has no CLDB object\n");
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
>> +		dev_err(&adev->dev, "CLDB object is not an ACPI buffer\n");
>> +		ret = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto out_free_buff;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (obj->buffer.length > sizeof(cldb)) {
>> +		dev_err(&adev->dev, "The CLDB buffer is too large\n");
>> +		ret = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto out_free_buff;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	memcpy(&cldb, obj->buffer.pointer, obj->buffer.length);
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * control_logic_type = 1 indicates this is a dummy INT3472 device of
>> +	 * the kind we're looking for. If any other value then we shouldn't try
>> +	 * to handle it
>> +	 */
>> +	if (cldb.control_logic_type != 1) {
>> +		ret = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto out_free_buff;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Space for 4 GPIOs - one more than we've seen so far plus a null */
>> +	int3472 = kzalloc(sizeof(*int3472) +
>> +			 ((INT3472_MAX_SENSOR_GPIOS + 1) * sizeof(struct gpiod_lookup)),
>> +			 GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!int3472) {
>> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
>> +		goto out_free_buff;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	int3472->adev = adev;
>> +	adev->driver_data = int3472;
>> +
>> +	int3472->sensor = acpi_dev_get_next_dep_dev(adev, NULL);
>> +	if (!int3472->sensor) {
>> +		dev_err(&adev->dev,
>> +			"This INT3472 entry seems to have no dependents.\n");
>> +		ret = -ENODEV;
>> +		goto out_free_int3472;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	int3472->gpios.dev_id = i2c_acpi_dev_name(int3472->sensor);
>> +
>> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&int3472->regulators);
>> +
>> +	int3472_parse_crs(int3472);
>> +
>> +	goto out_free_buff;
>> +
>> +out_free_int3472:
>> +	kfree(int3472);
>> +out_free_buff:
>> +	kfree(buffer.pointer);
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int int3472_remove(struct acpi_device *adev)
>> +{
>> +	struct int3472_gpio_regulator *reg;
>> +	struct int3472_device *int3472;
>> +
>> +	int3472 = acpi_driver_data(adev);
>> +
>> +	acpi_dev_put(int3472->sensor);
>> +	gpiod_remove_lookup_table(&int3472->gpios);
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry(reg, &int3472->regulators, list) {
>> +		gpiod_put(reg->gpio);
>> +		regulator_unregister(reg->rdev);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	kfree(int3472);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct acpi_device_id int3472_device_id[] = {
>> +	{ "INT3472", 0 },
>> +	{ },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, int3472_device_id);
>> +
>> +static struct acpi_driver int3472_driver = {
>> +	.name = "int3472",
>> +	.ids = int3472_device_id,
>> +	.ops = {
>> +		.add = int3472_add,
>> +		.remove = int3472_remove,
>> +	},
>> +	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> +};
>> +
>> +module_acpi_driver(int3472_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Dan Scally <djrscally@...il.com>");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ACPI Driver for Discrete type INT3472 ACPI Devices");
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.h b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..6964726e8e1f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/int3472.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>> +/* Author: Dan Scally <djrscally@...il.com> */
>> +#include <linux/regulator/machine.h>
>> +
>> +#define INT3472_MAX_SENSOR_GPIOS			3
>> +#define GPIO_REGULATOR_NAME_LENGTH			17
>> +#define GPIO_REGULATOR_SUPPLY_NAME_LENGTH		9
>> +
>> +#define INT3472_REGULATOR(_NAME, _SUPPLY, _ID, _OPS)	\
>> +	((const struct regulator_desc) {		\
>> +		.name = _NAME,				\
>> +		.supply_name = _SUPPLY,			\
>> +		.id = _ID,				\
>> +		.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE,		\
>> +		.ops = _OPS,				\
>> +		.owner = THIS_MODULE,			\
>> +	})
>> +
>> +const guid_t int3472_gpio_guid = GUID_INIT(0x79234640, 0x9e10, 0x4fea,
>> +					     0xa5, 0xc1, 0xb5, 0xaa, 0x8b,
>> +					     0x19, 0x75, 0x6f);
>> +
>> +const guid_t cio2_sensor_module_guid = GUID_INIT(0x822ace8f, 0x2814, 0x4174,
>> +						 0xa5, 0x6b, 0x5f, 0x02, 0x9f,
>> +						 0xe0, 0x79, 0xee);
>> +
>> +struct int3472_cldb {
>> +	u8 version;
>> +	/*
>> +	 * control logic type
>> +	 * 0: UNKNOWN
>> +	 * 1: DISCRETE(CRD-D)
>> +	 * 2: PMIC TPS68470
>> +	 * 3: PMIC uP6641
>> +	 */
>> +	u8 control_logic_type;
>> +	u8 control_logic_id;
>> +	u8 sensor_card_sku;
>> +	u8 reserved[28];
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct int3472_device {
>> +	struct acpi_device *adev;
>> +	struct acpi_device *sensor;
>> +
>> +	unsigned int n_gpios; /* how many GPIOs have we seen */
>> +
>> +	unsigned int n_regulators;
>> +	struct list_head regulators;
>> +
>> +	unsigned int n_sensor_gpios; /* how many have we mapped to sensor */
>> +	struct gpiod_lookup_table gpios;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct int3472_gpio_regulator {
>> +	char regulator_name[GPIO_REGULATOR_NAME_LENGTH];
>> +	char supply_name[GPIO_REGULATOR_SUPPLY_NAME_LENGTH];
>> +	struct gpio_desc *gpio;
>> +	struct regulator_dev *rdev;
>> +	struct regulator_desc rdesc;
>> +	struct list_head list;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct int3472_sensor_regulator_map {
>> +	char *sensor_module_name;
>> +	unsigned int n_supplies;
>> +	struct regulator_consumer_supply *supplies;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Here follows platform specific mapping information that we can pass to
>> + * regulator_init_data when we register our regulators. They're just mapped
>> + * via index, I.E. the first regulator pin that the code finds for the
>> + * i2c-OVTI2680:00 device is avdd, the second is dovdd and so on.
>> + */
>> +
>> +static struct regulator_consumer_supply miix_510_ov2680[] = {
>> +	{ "i2c-OVTI2680:00", "avdd" },
>> +	{ "i2c-OVTI2680:00", "dovdd" },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct regulator_consumer_supply surface_go2_ov5693[] = {
>> +	{ "i2c-INT33BE:00", "avdd" },
>> +	{ "i2c-INT33BE:00", "dovdd" },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct regulator_consumer_supply surface_book_ov5693[] = {
>> +	{ "i2c-INT33BE:00", "avdd" },
>> +	{ "i2c-INT33BE:00", "dovdd" },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct int3472_sensor_regulator_map int3472_sensor_regulator_maps[] = {
>> +	{ "GNDF140809R", 2, miix_510_ov2680 },
>> +	{ "YHCU", 2, surface_go2_ov5693 },
>> +	{ "MSHW0070", 2, surface_book_ov5693 },
>> +};
>>
> Thanks,
> JM

Powered by blists - more mailing lists