linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 14/18] acpi: utils: Add function to fetch dependent acpi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Nov 2020 23:54:44 +0000
From:   Dan Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devel@...ica.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        lenb@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        bgolaszewski@...libre.com, wsa@...nel.org, yong.zhi@...el.com,
        sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com, bingbu.cao@...el.com,
        tian.shu.qiu@...el.com, mchehab@...nel.org, robert.moore@...el.com,
        erik.kaneda@...el.com, pmladek@...e.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
        kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com, jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org,
        laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com,
        jorhand@...ux.microsoft.com, kitakar@...il.com,
        heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/18] acpi: utils: Add function to fetch dependent
 acpi_devices

Hi Andy

On 30/11/2020 18:23, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:31:25PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
>> ACPI devices declare themselves dependent on other devices via the _DEP
>> buffer. Fetching the dependee from dependent is a matter of parsing
>> _DEP, but currently there's no method to fetch dependent from dependee.
>> Add one, so we can parse sensors dependent on a PMIC from the PMIC's
>> acpi_driver.
> Do I understand correctly that it's an existing table provided by firmware that
> (ab)uses _DEP in such way? Note, the specification doesn't tell we may use it
> in this way, OTOH I don't remember if it strictly forbids such use.
>
> So, please elaborate in the commit message why you need this and pint out to
> the 6.5.8 "_DEP (Operation Region Dependencies)" which clearly says about
> OpRegions and that part already supported by ACPI in the Linux, if I'm not
> mistaken, need to refresh my memory.


Laurent's reply is good explanation, but for example see my Lenovo Miix
510's DSDT:


https://gist.githubusercontent.com/djrscally/e64d112180517352fa3392878b0f4a7d/raw/88b90b3ea4204fd7845257b6666fdade47cc2981/dsdt.dsl


Search OVTI2680 and OVTI5648 for the cameras. Both are dependent on
IN3472 devices (PMI0 and PMI1) which are the discrete type that we're
attempting to handle here.

>
> ...
>
>> +	handle = adev->handle;
>> +
>> +	if (!acpi_has_method(handle, "_DEP"))
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	status = acpi_evaluate_reference(handle, "_DEP", NULL, &dep_handles);
>> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < dep_handles.count; i++) {
>> +		struct acpi_device_info *info;
>> +
>> +		status = acpi_get_object_info(dep_handles.handles[i], &info);
>> +		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		if (info->valid & ACPI_VALID_HID) {
>> +			ret = acpi_bus_get_device(dep_handles.handles[i], &candidate);
>> +			if (ret || !candidate) {
>> +				kfree(info);
>> +				continue;
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			if (candidate == dependee) {
>> +				acpi_dev_put(candidate);
>> +				kfree(info);
>> +				return 1;
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			kfree(info);
>> +		}
>> +	}
> Can you utilize (by moving to here and export for ACPI layer the
> acpi_lpss_dep()?
oooh, yes, I think I can. Thank you!