linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the arm64 tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201130184835.18b5f4de@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:48:35 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the arm64 tree

Hi all,

On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:28:40 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   e710c29e0177 ("arm64: mte: make the per-task SCTLR_EL1 field usable elsewhere")
> 
> from the arm64 tree and commit:
> 
>   44a7127eb3a4 ("arm64: mte: add in-kernel MTE helpers")
> 
> from the akpm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (the former just removed some of the context for what the
> latter added) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as
> far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be
> mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
> merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
> of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

A couple of the following patches in the akpm tree also conflicted with
the arm64 tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped