linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] gpio: dwapb: mask/unmask IRQ when disable/enable it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:22:50 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Luo Jiaxing <luojiaxing@...wei.com>
Cc:     bgolaszewski@...libre.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxarm@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] gpio: dwapb: mask/unmask IRQ when disable/enable it

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 05:36:19PM +0800, Luo Jiaxing wrote:
> The mask and unmask registers are not configured in dwapb_irq_enable() and
> dwapb_irq_disable(). In the following situations, the IRQ will be masked by
> default after the IRQ is enabled:
> 
> mask IRQ -> disable IRQ -> enable IRQ
> 
> In this case, the IRQ status of GPIO controller is inconsistent with it's
> irq_data too. For example, in __irq_enable(), IRQD_IRQ_DISABLED and
> IRQD_IRQ_MASKED are both clear, but GPIO controller do not perform unmask.

Sounds a bit like a papering over the issue which is slightly different.
Can you elaborate more, why ->irq_mask() / ->irq_unmask() are not being called?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko