linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: fix reference leak in panfrost_job_hw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Nov 2020 20:26:21 +0800
From:   Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@...wei.com>
To:     Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
        Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@...labora.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        "Daniel Vetter" <daniel@...ll.ch>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: fix reference leak in
 panfrost_job_hw_submit



在 2020/11/27 18:06, Steven Price 写道:
> On 27/11/2020 09:44, Qinglang Miao wrote:
>> pm_runtime_get_sync will increment pm usage counter even it
>> failed. Forgetting to putting operation will result in a
>> reference leak here.
>>
>> A new function pm_runtime_resume_and_get is introduced in
>> [0] to keep usage counter balanced. So We fix the reference
>> leak by replacing it with new funtion.
>>
>> [0] dd8088d5a896 ("PM: runtime: Add  pm_runtime_resume_and_get to deal 
>> with usage counter")
>>
>> Fixes: f3ba91228e8e ("drm/panfrost: Add initial panfrost driver")
>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
>> index 30e7b7196..04cf3bb67 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
>> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static void panfrost_job_hw_submit(struct 
>> panfrost_job *job, int js)
>>       panfrost_devfreq_record_busy(&pfdev->pfdevfreq);
>> -    ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(pfdev->dev);
>> +    ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(pfdev->dev);
> 
> Sorry, but in this case this change isn't correct. 
> panfrost_job_hw_submit() is expected to be unbalanced (the PM reference 
> count is expected to be incremented on return).
> 
> In the case where pm_runtime_get_sync() fails, the job will eventually 
> timeout, and there's a corresponding pm_runtime_put_noidle() in 
> panfrost_reset().
> 
> Potentially this could be handled better (e.g. without waiting for the 
> timeout to occur), but equally this isn't something we expect to happen 
> in normal operation).
> 
> Steve
Sorry, I didn't notice the pm_runtime_put_noidle() in 
panfrost_job_timedout() before.

Thanks for your reply.
> 
>>       if (ret < 0)
>>           return;
>>
> 
> .