[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5e229e63-d127-a4dc-bc0a-c34a4a661cf6@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 11:05:44 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Laurent Vivier <lvivier@...hat.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/17] vdpa_sim: remove hard-coded virtq count
On 2020/11/26 下午10:49, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> From: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>
>
> Add a new attribute that will define the number of virt queues to be
> created for the vdpasim device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>
> [sgarzare: replace kmalloc_array() with kcalloc()]
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> ---
> v1:
> - use kcalloc() instead of kmalloc_array() since some function expects
> variables initialized to zero
> ---
> drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
> index c6eaf62df8ec..ad72f7b1a4eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static u64 vdpasim_features = (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT) |
> /* State of each vdpasim device */
> struct vdpasim {
> struct vdpa_device vdpa;
> - struct vdpasim_virtqueue vqs[VDPASIM_VQ_NUM];
> + struct vdpasim_virtqueue *vqs;
> struct work_struct work;
> /* spinlock to synchronize virtqueue state */
> spinlock_t lock;
> @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct vdpasim {
> u32 status;
> u32 generation;
> u64 features;
> + int nvqs;
> /* spinlock to synchronize iommu table */
> spinlock_t iommu_lock;
> };
> @@ -131,7 +132,7 @@ static void vdpasim_reset(struct vdpasim *vdpasim)
> {
> int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < VDPASIM_VQ_NUM; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < vdpasim->nvqs; i++)
> vdpasim_vq_reset(&vdpasim->vqs[i]);
>
> spin_lock(&vdpasim->iommu_lock);
> @@ -337,7 +338,7 @@ static struct vdpasim *vdpasim_create(void)
> const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops;
> struct vdpasim *vdpasim;
> struct device *dev;
> - int ret = -ENOMEM;
> + int i, ret = -ENOMEM;
>
> if (batch_mapping)
> ops = &vdpasim_net_batch_config_ops;
> @@ -348,6 +349,7 @@ static struct vdpasim *vdpasim_create(void)
> if (!vdpasim)
> goto err_alloc;
>
> + vdpasim->nvqs = VDPASIM_VQ_NUM;
> INIT_WORK(&vdpasim->work, vdpasim_work);
> spin_lock_init(&vdpasim->lock);
> spin_lock_init(&vdpasim->iommu_lock);
> @@ -358,6 +360,11 @@ static struct vdpasim *vdpasim_create(void)
> goto err_iommu;
> set_dma_ops(dev, &vdpasim_dma_ops);
>
> + vdpasim->vqs = kcalloc(vdpasim->nvqs, sizeof(struct vdpasim_virtqueue),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!vdpasim->vqs)
> + goto err_iommu;
> +
> vdpasim->iommu = vhost_iotlb_alloc(2048, 0);
> if (!vdpasim->iommu)
> goto err_iommu;
> @@ -376,8 +383,8 @@ static struct vdpasim *vdpasim_create(void)
> eth_random_addr(vdpasim->config.mac);
> }
>
> - vringh_set_iotlb(&vdpasim->vqs[0].vring, vdpasim->iommu);
> - vringh_set_iotlb(&vdpasim->vqs[1].vring, vdpasim->iommu);
> + for (i = 0; i < vdpasim->nvqs; i++)
> + vringh_set_iotlb(&vdpasim->vqs[i].vring, vdpasim->iommu);
>
> vdpasim->vdpa.dma_dev = dev;
> ret = vdpa_register_device(&vdpasim->vdpa);
> @@ -646,6 +653,7 @@ static void vdpasim_free(struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
> kfree(vdpasim->buffer);
> if (vdpasim->iommu)
> vhost_iotlb_free(vdpasim->iommu);
> + kfree(vdpasim->vqs);
> }
>
> static const struct vdpa_config_ops vdpasim_net_config_ops = {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists