[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201130142918.GJ4072@dragon>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 22:29:19 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc: "Y.b. Lu" <yangbo.lu@....com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ashish Kumar <ashish.kumar@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ls1028a: make the eMMC and SD card
controllers use fixed indices
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 09:25:23AM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> We are going cirlces here. I guess Shawn (as the soc maintainer) has to
> step in and decide if a common soc include should contain aliases for
> nodes which are disabled. That is what it boils down to.
>
> All other arguments against having aliases in the common include can be
> found in this thread.
>
> > Distros, bootloaders, and users' cases using fixed index before could
> > avoid issues, and been used as they were.
>
> Nobody argue against having these alias. We are arguing against having
> them in the common soc include.
342ab37ecaf8 ("arm64: dts: freescale: use fixed index mmcN for
layerscape") is dropped from my tree.
Shawn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists