lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <05121515e73891ceb9e5caf64b6111fc8ff43fab.camel@gmx.de>
Date:   Mon, 30 Nov 2020 16:01:11 +0100
From:   Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: scheduling while atomic in z3fold

On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 15:52 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> How do you test this? I triggered a few oom-killer and I have here git
> gc running for a few hours now… Everything is fine.

In an LTP install, ./runltp -f mm.  Shortly after box starts swapping
insanely, it explodes quite reliably here with either z3fold or
zsmalloc.. but not with zbud.

	-Mike

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ