[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cd0592be-68d2-c88d-ff18-05f7d3ba8cc2@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 17:54:57 +0200
From: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To: Alexandre Truong <alexandre.truong@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: add aarch64 registers to --user-regs
On 27/11/2020 17:39, Alexandre Truong wrote:
> Previously, this command returns no help message on aarch64:
>
> -> ./perf record --user-regs=?
>
> available registers:
> Usage: perf record [<options>] [<command>]
> or: perf record [<options>] -- <command> [<options>]
>
> With this change, the registers are listed.
>
> -> ./perf record --user-regs=?
>
> available registers: x0 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 x19 x20 x21 x22 x23 x24 x25 x26 x27 x28 x29 lr sp pc
>
> It's also now possible to record subsets of registers on aarch64:
>
> -> ./perf record --user-regs=x4,x5 ls
> -> ./perf report --dump-raw-trace
>
> 12801163749305260 0xc70 [0x40]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x2): 51956/51956: 0xffffaa6571f0 period: 145785 addr: 0
> ... user regs: mask 0x30 ABI 64-bit
> .... x4 0x000000000000006c
> .... x5 0x0000001001000001
> ... thread: ls:51956
> ...... dso: /usr/lib64/ld-2.17.so
>
Checked that the registers can be listed with =? and that recording different combinations of registers works as expected.
Tested-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists