| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20201130155717.26008-5-ben.levinsky@xilinx.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 07:57:16 -0800
From: Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@...inx.com>
To: <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
CC: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v24 4/5] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add documentation for ZynqMP R5 rproc bindings
Add binding for ZynqMP R5 OpenAMP.
Represent the RPU domain resources in one device node. Each RPU
processor is a subnode of the top RPU domain node.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wu <j.wu@...inx.com>
Signed-off-by: Wendy Liang <jliang@...inx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@...inx.com>
---
v24: update for 'make dt_binding_check' errors
---
.../xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml | 223 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 223 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..bccbdee8c3f2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,223 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml#"
+$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#"
+
+title: Xilinx R5 remote processor controller bindings
+
+description:
+ This document defines the binding for the remoteproc component that loads and
+ boots firmwares on the Xilinx Zynqmp and Versal family chipsets.
+
+ Note that the Linux has global addressing view of the R5-related memory (TCM)
+ so the absolute address ranges are provided in TCM reg's.
+
+maintainers:
+ - Ed Mooring <ed.mooring@...inx.com>
+ - Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@...inx.com>
+
+properties:
+ $nodename:
+ pattern: "^r5fss(@.*)?"
+
+ compatible:
+ enum:
+ - xlnx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc
+
+ reg:
+ items:
+ - description: Address and Size of Xilinx RPU Configuration register
+
+ "#address-cells":
+ const: 2
+
+ "#size-cells":
+ const: 2
+
+ ranges: true
+
+# Optional properties:
+# --------------------
+ xlnx,cluster-mode:
+ $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
+ enum: [0, 1]
+ description: |
+ Configuration Mode for the Dual R5F cores within the R5F cluster.
+ Should be either a value of 1 (LockStep mode) or 0 (Split mode),
+ default is LockStep mode if omitted.
+
+
+#R5F Processor Child Nodes:
+# ==========================
+
+patternProperties:
+ "^r5f_[a-f0-9]+$":
+ type: object
+ description: |
+ The R5F Sub-System device node should define one or two R5F child nodes,
+ each node representing a Xilinx instantiation of the Arm Cortex R5F core.
+ There should be one or two child nodes if the R5F is in Split mode and
+ one child node if the R5F is in Lockstep mode.
+
+ In Split mode each R5F core has two associated TCM Banks. R5_0 has
+ TCM Banks 0A and 0B and R5_1 has TCM Banks 1A and 1B.
+
+ In Lockstep mode only one R5F child node should be defined. This one
+ child has access to TCM Banks 0A, 0B, 1A and 1B and any of the four can
+ be included in the child R5F's sram property.
+
+ The example below shows Split mode with two child nodes.
+
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ enum:
+ - xilinx,r5f
+
+# The following properties are mandatory for R5F Core0 in both LockStep and Split
+# modes, and are mandatory for R5F Core1 _only_ in Split mode.
+
+ memory-region:
+ description: |
+ Phandles to the memory nodes to be associated with the
+ The reserved memory nodes should be carveout nodes, and
+ should be defined with a "no-map" property as per the bindings in
+ Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt
+ minItems: 1
+ maxItems: 6
+ items:
+ - description: Region used for dynamic DMA allocations like vrings and
+ vring buffers
+ - description: region reserved for firmware image sections
+ additionalItems: true
+
+ power-domain:
+ description: |
+ Power node ID that is used to uniquely identify the RPU for Xilinx
+ Power Management.
+ maxItems: 1
+
+# Optional properties:
+# --------------------
+# The following properties are optional properties for each of the R5F cores:
+
+ mboxes:
+ description: |
+ Standard property to specify a mailbox
+ This property is required only if the rpmsg/virtio functionality
+ is used
+
+ Refer to the zynqmp-ipi-mailbox documentation for client usage of this
+ property
+ maxItems: 1
+
+ mbox-names:
+ description: |
+ Refer to the zynqmp-ipi-mailbox documentation for client usage of this
+ property
+ items:
+ - const: tx
+ - const: rx
+
+ sram:
+ $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
+ minItems: 1
+ maxItems: 4
+ description: |
+ Phandles to one or more reserved on-chip SRAM regions. The regions
+ should be defined as child nodes of the respective SRAM node, and
+ should be defined as per the generic bindings in,
+ Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
+
+ required:
+ - compatible
+ - power-domain
+
+ unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+required:
+ - reg
+ - compatible
+ - "#address-cells"
+ - "#size-cells"
+ - ranges
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+ - |
+ / {
+ compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-zcu102-rev1.0", "xlnx,zynqmp-zcu102", "xlnx,zynqmp";
+ #address-cells = <2>;
+ #size-cells = <2>;
+ model = "ZynqMP ZCU102 ";
+
+ zynqmp_ipi1 {
+ compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-ipi-mailbox";
+ interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
+ interrupts = <0 33 4>;
+ xlnx,ipi-id = <5>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ ipi_mailbox_rpu0: mailbox@...90600 {
+ reg = <0xff990600 0x20>,
+ <0xff990620 0x20>,
+ <0xff9900c0 0x20>,
+ <0xff9900e0 0x20>;
+ reg-names = "local_request_region",
+ "local_response_region",
+ "remote_request_region",
+ "remote_response_region";
+ #mbox-cells = <1>;
+ xlnx,ipi-id = <3>;
+ };
+ ipi_mailbox_rpu1: mailbox@...90780 {
+ reg = <0xff990780 0x20>,
+ <0xff9907a0 0x20>,
+ <0xff9907c0 0x20>,
+ <0xff9905a0 0x20>;
+ reg-names = "local_request_region",
+ "local_response_region",
+ "remote_request_region",
+ "remote_response_region";
+ #mbox-cells = <1>;
+ xlnx,ipi-id = <3>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ r5fss@...a0000 {
+ compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc";
+ #address-cells = <2>;
+ #size-cells = <2>;
+ ranges;
+ reg = <0x0 0xff9a0000 0x0 0x10000>;
+ xlnx,cluster-mode = <0>;
+
+ r5f_0 {
+ compatible = "xilinx,r5f";
+ memory-region = <&elf_load0>,
+ <&rpu0vdev0vring0>,
+ <&rpu0vdev0vring1>,
+ <&rpu0vdev0buffer>;
+ sram = <&tcm_0a>, <&tcm_0b>;
+ mboxes = <&ipi_mailbox_rpu0 0x0 &ipi_mailbox_rpu0 0x1>;
+ mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
+ power-domain = <0x7>;
+ };
+ r5f_1 {
+ compatible = "xilinx,r5f";
+ memory-region = <&elf_load1>,
+ <&rpu1vdev0vring0>,
+ <&rpu1vdev0vring1>,
+ <&rpu1vdev0buffer>;
+ sram = <&tcm_1a>, <&tcm_1b>;
+ mboxes = <&ipi_mailbox_rpu1 0x0 &ipi_mailbox_rpu1 0x1>;
+ mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
+ power-domain = <0x8>;
+ };
+
+ };
+ };
+
+...
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists