linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb-storage: revert from scsi_add_host_with_dma() to scsi_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:24:01 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Tom Yan <tom.ty89@...il.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        linux-usb <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb-storage: revert from scsi_add_host_with_dma()
 to scsi_add_host()

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 12:20:04PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/fde7e11f-5dfc-8348-c134-a21cb1116285@redhat.com/T/#t
> 
> It's hard to go wrong with reverting, so it's okay with me.
> 
> Still, Hans, have you checked out the difference between the 
> scsi_add_host() and scsi_add_host_with_dma() calls?  It's just a matter 
> of using dev vs. sysdev.  In particular, have you checked to see what 
> those two devices are on your system?
> 
> It seems likely that if one of those calls messes up some DMA settings, 
> the other one does too -- just maybe not settings that matter much.

The effects from scsi_add_host_with_dma should be:

 (1) picking which device is used for the SCSI dma map helpers
 (2) use dma_max_mapping_size() to limite the I/O size

The helpers affected by (1) are not used by UAS (or usb-storage for that
matter), while we do have a real bug in the intel-iommu with bounce
buffering implementation used in the bug report.  So my clear bet is on
(2) not limiting the size, but the patch that would have fixed this
did not make a different for Hans, which leaves me a little confused.