lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 13:06:59 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> To: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@...il.com> Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] lib: Convert test_hexdump.c to KUnit On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 9:21 AM Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@...il.com> wrote: > Convert test lib/test_hexdump.c to KUnit. More information about > KUnit can be found at: > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/kunit/index.html. > KUnit provides a common framework for unit tests in the kernel. > KUnit and kselftest are standardizing around KTAP, converting this > test to KUnit makes this test output in KTAP which we are trying to > make the standard test result format for the kernel. Below doesn't suit commit message, perhaps adding it after '---' line would be good. In the commit message you can choose one failed case followed by all OK and show the difference. > I ran both the original and converted tests as is to produce the > output for success of the test in the two cases. I also ran these > tests with a small modification to show the difference in the output > for failure of the test in both cases. The modification I made is: > static const char * const test_data_4_le[] __initconst = { > - "7bdb32be", "b293180a", "24c4ba70", "9b34837d", > + "7bdb32be", "b293180a", "24c4ba70", "9b3483d", > > The difference in outputs can be seen here: > https://gist.github.com/arpi-r/38f53a3c65692bf684a6bf3453884b6e Looks pretty much good, what I'm sad to see is the absence of the test statistics. Any ideas if we can get it back? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists