[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5c2a18f72af861be6494c2f325e83835be8e2f7e.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 06:37:25 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>,
bauerman@...ux.ibm.com, robh@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, james.morse@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, sashal@...nel.org, will@...nel.org,
mpe@...erman.id.au, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, frowand.list@...il.com,
vincenzo.frascino@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com,
pasha.tatashin@...een.com, allison@...utok.net,
kstewart@...uxfoundation.org, takahiro.akashi@...aro.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, masahiroy@...nel.org, bhsharma@...hat.com,
mbrugger@...e.com, hsinyi@...omium.org, tao.li@...o.com,
christophe.leroy@....fr
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, prsriva@...ux.microsoft.com,
balajib@...ux.microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/8] ima: Define get_ima_kexec_buffer() in drivers/of
On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 11:22 -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> The function do_get_kexec_buffer(), defined in arch/powerpc/kexec/ima.c,
> retrieves the address and size of the given property from the device
> tree blob. This function does not have architecture specific code, but is
> currently limited to powerpc. This function correctly handles a device
> tree property that is a child node of the root node, but not anything
> other than the immediate root child nodes.
>
> Define an architecture independent function, namely
> get_ima_kexec_buffer(), in "drivers/of/ima_kexec.c". This function
> retrieves the chosen node, namely "linux,ima-kexec-buffer", from
Please remove the word "namely", here, and throughout the patch sets.
> the device tree, and returns the address and size of the buffer used
> for carrying forward the IMA measurement log across kexec system call.
get_ima_kexec_buffer() inlines the existing do_get_kexec_buffer() and
get_addr_size_cells() functions, leaving a local copy of
get_addr_size_cells(). Duplicating code isn't a good idea.
thanks,
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists