linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] SPI broken for SPI based panel drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201201121620.GB5239@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 1 Dec 2020 12:16:20 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
Cc:     Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Discussions about the Letux Kernel 
        <letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] SPI broken for SPI based panel drivers

On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 09:59:43AM +0100, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> > Am 30.11.2020 um 21:13 schrieb Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>:

> > We knew that there was a chance that our fix would break something else.
> > But hopefully "it fixes more than it breaks"

> Then it should not have been applied to mainline but fully worked out
> and tested.

If you want to see better testing of things in mainline please
contribute to the various kernel testing efforts that are out there,
there's a huge range of systems out there using the kernel and it's
simply not realistic to expect that they'll all be covered, the testing
effort for the kernel is very much a community effort.  If there are
things that are particularly important to you the best way to ensure
that they are tested is to provide that testing yourself.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)