lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:42:07 -0800
From:   "Asutosh Das (asd)" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>
To:     Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>, nguyenb@...eaurora.org,
        hongwus@...eaurora.org, ziqichen@...eaurora.org,
        rnayak@...eaurora.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, saravanak@...gle.com, salyzyn@...gle.com
Cc:     Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] scsi: ufs: Fix a racing problem between
 ufshcd_abort and eh_work

On 11/16/2020 11:04 PM, Can Guo wrote:
> In current task abort routine, if task abort happens to the device W-LU,
> the code directly jumps to ufshcd_eh_host_reset_handler() to perform a
> full reset and restore then returns FAIL or SUCCESS. Commands sent to the
> device W-LU are most likely the SSU cmds sent during UFS PM operations. If
> such SSU cmd enters task abort routine, when ufshcd_eh_host_reset_handler()
> flushes eh_work, there will be racing because err_handler is serialized
> with any PM operations.
> 
> Since the main idea of aborting one cmd to the device W-LU is to perform
> a full reset and restore, in order to resolve the racing problem, we merely
> clean up the lrb taken by this cmd, queue the eh_work and abort the cmd.
> Since the cmd has been aborted, the PM operation which sends the cmd simply
> errors out, thus err_handler will not be blocked by ongoing PM operations
> and err_handler can also recover PM error if any, which comes as another
> benefit of this change.
> 
> Because such cmd is aborted even before it is actually cleared from HW, set
> the lrb->in_use flag to prevent subsequent cmds, including SCSI cmds and
> dev cmds, from taking the lrb released by this cmd. Flag lrb->in_use shall
> evetually be cleared in __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() invoked by the full
> reset and restore from err_handler.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>

>   drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>   drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h |  2 ++
>   2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index 7e764e8..cd7394e 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -2539,6 +2539,14 @@ static int ufshcd_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>   		(hba->clk_gating.state != CLKS_ON));
>   
>   	lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
> +	if (unlikely(lrbp->in_use)) {
> +		if (hba->pm_op_in_progress)
> +			set_host_byte(cmd, DID_BAD_TARGET);
> +		else
> +			err = SCSI_MLQUEUE_HOST_BUSY;
> +		ufshcd_release(hba);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
>   
>   	WARN_ON(lrbp->cmd);
>   	lrbp->cmd = cmd;
> @@ -2781,6 +2789,11 @@ static int ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>   
>   	init_completion(&wait);
>   	lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
> +	if (unlikely(lrbp->in_use)) {
> +		err = -EBUSY;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
>   	WARN_ON(lrbp->cmd);
>   	err = ufshcd_compose_dev_cmd(hba, lrbp, cmd_type, tag);
>   	if (unlikely(err))
> @@ -2797,6 +2810,7 @@ static int ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>   
>   	err = ufshcd_wait_for_dev_cmd(hba, lrbp, timeout);
>   
> +out:
>   	ufshcd_add_query_upiu_trace(hba, tag,
>   			err ? "query_complete_err" : "query_complete");
>   
> @@ -4932,6 +4946,7 @@ static void __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>   
>   	for_each_set_bit(index, &completed_reqs, hba->nutrs) {
>   		lrbp = &hba->lrb[index];
> +		lrbp->in_use = false;
>   		lrbp->compl_time_stamp = ktime_get();
>   		cmd = lrbp->cmd;
>   		if (cmd) {
> @@ -6374,8 +6389,12 @@ static int ufshcd_issue_devman_upiu_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>   
>   	init_completion(&wait);
>   	lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
> -	WARN_ON(lrbp->cmd);
> +	if (unlikely(lrbp->in_use)) {
> +		err = -EBUSY;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
>   
> +	WARN_ON(lrbp->cmd);
>   	lrbp->cmd = NULL;
>   	lrbp->sense_bufflen = 0;
>   	lrbp->sense_buffer = NULL;
> @@ -6447,6 +6466,7 @@ static int ufshcd_issue_devman_upiu_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> +out:
>   	blk_put_request(req);
>   out_unlock:
>   	up_read(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
> @@ -6696,16 +6716,6 @@ static int ufshcd_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>   		BUG();
>   	}
>   
> -	/*
> -	 * Task abort to the device W-LUN is illegal. When this command
> -	 * will fail, due to spec violation, scsi err handling next step
> -	 * will be to send LU reset which, again, is a spec violation.
> -	 * To avoid these unnecessary/illegal step we skip to the last error
> -	 * handling stage: reset and restore.
> -	 */
> -	if (lrbp->lun == UFS_UPIU_UFS_DEVICE_WLUN)
> -		return ufshcd_eh_host_reset_handler(cmd);
> -
>   	ufshcd_hold(hba, false);
>   	reg = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_DOOR_BELL);
>   	/* If command is already aborted/completed, return SUCCESS */
> @@ -6726,7 +6736,7 @@ static int ufshcd_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>   	 * to reduce repeated printouts. For other aborted requests only print
>   	 * basic details.
>   	 */
> -	scsi_print_command(hba->lrb[tag].cmd);
> +	scsi_print_command(cmd);
>   	if (!hba->req_abort_count) {
>   		ufshcd_update_reg_hist(&hba->ufs_stats.task_abort, 0);
>   		ufshcd_print_host_regs(hba);
> @@ -6745,6 +6755,27 @@ static int ufshcd_abort(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>   		goto cleanup;
>   	}
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * Task abort to the device W-LUN is illegal. When this command
> +	 * will fail, due to spec violation, scsi err handling next step
> +	 * will be to send LU reset which, again, is a spec violation.
> +	 * To avoid these unnecessary/illegal steps, first we clean up
> +	 * the lrb taken by this cmd and mark the lrb as in_use, then
> +	 * queue the eh_work and bail.
> +	 */
> +	if (lrbp->lun == UFS_UPIU_UFS_DEVICE_WLUN) {
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(host->host_lock, flags);
> +		if (lrbp->cmd) {
> +			__ufshcd_transfer_req_compl(hba, (1UL << tag));
> +			__set_bit(tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs);
> +			lrbp->in_use = true;
> +			hba->force_reset = true;
> +			ufshcd_schedule_eh_work(hba);
> +		}
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
>   	/* Skip task abort in case previous aborts failed and report failure */
>   	if (lrbp->req_abort_skip)
>   		err = -EIO;
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> index 1e680bf..66e5338 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ struct ufs_pm_lvl_states {
>    * @crypto_key_slot: the key slot to use for inline crypto (-1 if none)
>    * @data_unit_num: the data unit number for the first block for inline crypto
>    * @req_abort_skip: skip request abort task flag
> + * @in_use: indicates that this lrb is still in use
>    */
>   struct ufshcd_lrb {
>   	struct utp_transfer_req_desc *utr_descriptor_ptr;
> @@ -192,6 +193,7 @@ struct ufshcd_lrb {
>   #endif
>   
>   	bool req_abort_skip;
> +	bool in_use;
>   };
>   
>   /**
> 


-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ