linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: configs: drop unused BACKLIGHT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 1 Dec 2020 14:40:53 +0000
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     ZHIZHIKIN Andrey <andrey.zhizhikin@...ca-geosystems.com>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        "linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com" <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        "alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        "ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com" <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        "tony@...mide.com" <tony@...mide.com>,
        "mripard@...nel.org" <mripard@...nel.org>,
        "wens@...e.org" <wens@...e.org>,
        "jernej.skrabec@...l.net" <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        "thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        "jonathanh@...dia.com" <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
        "tsbogend@...ha.franken.de" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        "James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com" 
        <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
        "deller@....de" <deller@....de>,
        "mpe@...erman.id.au" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        "benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        "paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>,
        "lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        "sam@...nborg.org" <sam@...nborg.org>,
        "emil.l.velikov@...il.com" <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>,
        "daniel.thompson@...aro.org" <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        arm@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: configs: drop unused BACKLIGHT_GENERIC option

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 07:50:25PM +0000, ZHIZHIKIN Andrey wrote:
> From Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>:
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 03:21:33PM +0000, Andrey Zhizhikin wrote:
> > > Commit 7ecdea4a0226 ("backlight: generic_bl: Remove this driver as it is
> > > unused") removed geenric_bl driver from the tree, together with
> > > corresponding config option.
> > >
> > > Remove BACKLIGHT_GENERIC config item from all ARM configurations.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 7ecdea4a0226 ("backlight: generic_bl: Remove this driver as it
> > > is unused")
> > > Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Zhizhikin
> > > <andrey.zhizhikin@...ca-geosystems.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/configs/at91_dt_defconfig        | 1 -
> > >  arch/arm/configs/cm_x300_defconfig        | 1 -
> > >  arch/arm/configs/colibri_pxa300_defconfig | 1 -
> > >  arch/arm/configs/jornada720_defconfig     | 1 -
> > >  arch/arm/configs/magician_defconfig       | 1 -
> > >  arch/arm/configs/mini2440_defconfig       | 1 -
> > >  arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig      | 1 -
> > >  arch/arm/configs/pxa3xx_defconfig         | 1 -
> > >  arch/arm/configs/qcom_defconfig           | 1 -
> > >  arch/arm/configs/sama5_defconfig          | 1 -
> > >  arch/arm/configs/sunxi_defconfig          | 1 -
> > >  arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig          | 1 -
> > >  arch/arm/configs/u8500_defconfig          | 1 -
> > >  13 files changed, 13 deletions(-)
> > 
> > You need to send it to arm-soc maintainers, otherwise no one might feel
> > responsible enough to pick it up.
> 
> Good point, thanks a lot!
> 
> I was not aware of the fact that there is a separate ML that should
> receive patches targeted ARM SOCs. Can you (or anyone else) please
> share it, so I can re-send it there as well?

It's not a mailing list as such (with archives etc.), just an alias to
the arm-soc maintainers: arm@...nel.org.

> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> > 
> > +CC Arnd and Olof,
> > 
> > Dear Arnd and Olof,
> > 
> > Maybe it is worth to add arm-soc entry to the MAINTAINERS file?
> > Otherwise how one could get your email address? Not mentioning the
> > secret-soc address. :)

I tried to convince them before, it didn't work. I guess they don't like
to be spammed ;). Or rather, SoC-specific patches, even to defconfig,
should go through the specific SoC maintainers. However, there are
occasional defconfig patches which are more generic or affecting
multiple SoCs. I just ignore them as the arm64 defconfig is usually
handled by the arm-soc folk (when I need a defconfig change, I go for
arch/arm64/Kconfig directly ;)).

Anyway, I still think that we should add a MAINTAINERS entry for
arch/arm64/configs/defconfig and arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms.

-- 
Catalin