lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201201150114.GZ2414@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Tue, 1 Dec 2020 16:01:14 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] irqtime: Move irqtime entry accounting after irq
 offset incrementation

On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 03:35:45PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> And that one too makes things simple. But note that
> 
>     account_hardirq_enter_time()
> 
> will still need some preempt count checks to see if
> this is a nested hardirq, a hardirq interrupting a softirq
> or a hardirq interrupting a task.

So the current tests get that all correct in a single function.
Splitting it out will just result in more lines to get wrong.

That is, I don't think you can do it saner than:

  account_softirq_enter() := irqtime_account_irq(curr, SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
  account_softirq_exit()  := irqtime_account_irq(curr, 0);
  account_hardirq_enter() := irqtime_account_irq(curr, HARDIRQ_OFFSET);
  account_hardirq_exit()  := irqtime_account_irq(curr, 0);

Fundamentally you have to determine the previous context to determine
where to account the delta to. Note that when the previous context is
task context we throw away the delta.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ