| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20201201185737.GA93208@C02TD0UTHF1T.local>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 18:57:37 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] locking/urgent for v5.10-rc6
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 07:15:06PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 03:55:19PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 06:46:44AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > > > So after having talked to Sven a bit, the thing that is happening, is
> > > > that this is the one place where we take interrupts with RCU being
> > > > disabled. Normally RCU is watching and all is well, except during idle.
> > >
> > > Isn't interrupt entry supposed to invoke rcu_irq_enter() at some point?
> > > Or did this fall victim to recent optimizations?
> >
> > It does, but the problem is that s390 is still using
>
> I might've been too quick there, I can't actually seem to find where
> s390 does rcu_irq_enter()/exit().
>
> Also, I'm thinking the below might just about solve the current problem.
> The next problem would then be it calling TRACE_IRQS_ON after it did
> rcu_irq_exit()... :/
I gave this patch a go under QEMU TCG atop v5.10-rc6 s390 defconfig with
PROVE_LOCKING and DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP. It significantly reduces the
number of lockdep splats, but IIUC we need to handle the io_int_handler
path in addition to the ext_int_handler path, and there's a remaining
lockdep splat (below).
If this ends up looking like we'll need more point-fixes, I wonder if we
should conditionalise the new behaviour of the core idle code under a
new CONFIG symbol for now, and opt-in x86 and arm64, then transition the
rest once they've had a chance to test. They'll still be broken in the
mean time, but no more so than they previously were.
Thanks,
Mark.
[ 3.870912] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 3.871225] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirq_chain_key != current->curr_chain_key)
[ 3.872025] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4155 lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x150/0x158
[ 3.872249] Modules linked in:
[ 3.873096] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 5.10.0-rc6-dirty #9
[ 3.873262] Hardware name: QEMU 2964 QEMU (KVM/Linux)
[ 3.873584] Krnl PSW : 0404e00180000000 0000000000ce51ac (lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x154/0x158)
[ 3.873967] R:0 T:1 IO:0 EX:0 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:2 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3
[ 3.874214] Krnl GPRS: c0000000ffffefff 00000000011e5218 000000000000004a 00000000001d988a
[ 3.874363] 00000000ffffffea 000003e000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
[ 3.874511] 0000000000000000 000000000141e5f0 0000000003278000 0000000000cf354a
[ 3.874658] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000ce51a8 000003e000073db0
[ 3.876258] Krnl Code: 0000000000ce519c: c0200012432c larl %r2,0000000000f2d7f4
[ 3.876258] 0000000000ce51a2: c0e5ffff83db brasl %r14,0000000000cd5958
[ 3.876258] #0000000000ce51a8: af000000 mc 0,0
[ 3.876258] >0000000000ce51ac: a7f4ffb3 brc 15,0000000000ce5112
[ 3.876258] 0000000000ce51b0: ebeff0880024 stmg %r14,%r15,136(%r15)
[ 3.876258] 0000000000ce51b6: b90400ef lgr %r14,%r15
[ 3.876258] 0000000000ce51ba: e3f0ffe0ff71 lay %r15,-32(%r15)
[ 3.876258] 0000000000ce51c0: e3e0f0980024 stg %r14,152(%r15)
[ 3.877823] Call Trace:
[ 3.878073] [<0000000000ce51ac>] lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x154/0x158
[ 3.878260] ([<0000000000ce51a8>] lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x150/0x158)
[ 3.878406] [<0000000000cf3596>] default_idle_call+0xb6/0x2a8
[ 3.878549] [<0000000000194f60>] do_idle+0xe0/0x190
[ 3.878682] [<00000000001952ae>] cpu_startup_entry+0x36/0x40
[ 3.878816] [<0000000000118152>] smp_start_secondary+0x82/0x88
[ 3.878975] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[ 3.879119] Last Breaking-Event-Address:
[ 3.879273] [<0000000000cf76d0>] __s390_indirect_jump_r14+0x0/0xc
[ 3.879456] irq event stamp: 104
[ 3.879619] hardirqs last enabled at (102): [<00000000001a540c>] load_balance+0x28c/0x990
[ 3.879783] hardirqs last disabled at (103): [<0000000000cf7626>] __do_softirq+0x536/0x5c8
[ 3.879945] softirqs last enabled at (104): [<0000000000cf7584>] __do_softirq+0x494/0x5c8
[ 3.880114] softirqs last disabled at (95): [<000000000010df60>] do_softirq_own_stack+0x70/0x80
[ 3.880724] random: get_random_bytes called from __warn+0x12a/0x160 with crng_init=0
[ 3.882060] ---[ end trace ffae6482e242107b ]---
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/irq.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/irq.h
> index 9f75d67b8c20..24d3dd482df7 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/irq.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/irq.h
> @@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ void irq_subclass_unregister(enum irq_subclass subclass);
>
> #define irq_canonicalize(irq) (irq)
>
> +extern __visible void ext_do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long vector);
> +
> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>
> #endif /* _ASM_IRQ_H */
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S b/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
> index 26bb0603c5a1..b8e89b685038 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -976,16 +976,10 @@ ENTRY(ext_int_handler)
> xc __PT_FLAGS(8,%r11),__PT_FLAGS(%r11)
> TSTMSK __LC_CPU_FLAGS,_CIF_IGNORE_IRQ
> jo .Lio_restore
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS)
> - tmhh %r8,0x300
> jz 1f
> - TRACE_IRQS_OFF
> -1:
> -#endif
> xc __SF_BACKCHAIN(8,%r15),__SF_BACKCHAIN(%r15)
> lgr %r2,%r11 # pass pointer to pt_regs
> lghi %r3,EXT_INTERRUPT
> - brasl %r14,do_IRQ
> + brasl %r14,ext_do_IRQ
> j .Lio_return
> ENDPROC(ext_int_handler)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c b/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c
> index 3514420f0259..f4a29114e9fd 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c
> @@ -329,3 +329,23 @@ void irq_subclass_unregister(enum irq_subclass subclass)
> spin_unlock(&irq_subclass_lock);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(irq_subclass_unregister);
> +
> +noinstr void ext_do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long vector)
> +{
> + bool rcu = false;
> +
> + lockdep_hardirqs_off(CALLER_ADDR0);
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TINY_RCU) && is_idle_task(current)) {
> + rcu_irq_enter();
> + rcu = true;
> + }
> + /* instrumentation_begin(); */
> +
> + trace_hardirqs_off_finish();
> +
> + do_IRQ(regs, vector);
> +
> + /* instrumentation_end(); */
> + if (rcu)
> + rcu_irq_exit();
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists