[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201201191133.GA221478@google.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 14:11:33 -0500
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@...italocean.com>,
Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@...italocean.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Vineeth Pillai <viremana@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@...il.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.intel@...il.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
keescook@...omium.org, kerrnel@...gle.com,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, vineeth@...byteword.org,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Agata Gruza <agata.gruza@...el.com>,
Antonio Gomez Iglesias <antonio.gomez.iglesias@...el.com>,
graf@...zon.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com, dfaggioli@...e.com,
pjt@...gle.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, derkling@...gle.com,
benbjiang@...cent.com,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, OWeisse@...ch.edu,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...cle.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>, jsbarnes@...gle.com,
chris.hyser@...cle.com, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 22/32] sched: Split the cookie and setup per-task
cookie on fork
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 12:15:41PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 06:19:52PM -0500, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
>
> > +/*
> > + * Ensure that the task has been requeued. The stopper ensures that the task cannot
> > + * be migrated to a different CPU while its core scheduler queue state is being updated.
> > + * It also makes sure to requeue a task if it was running actively on another CPU.
> > + */
> > +static int sched_core_task_join_stopper(void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct sched_core_task_write_tag *tag = (struct sched_core_task_write_tag *)data;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
> > + sched_core_tag_requeue(tag->tasks[i], tag->cookies[i], false /* !group */);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int sched_core_share_tasks(struct task_struct *t1, struct task_struct *t2)
> > +{
>
> > + stop_machine(sched_core_task_join_stopper, (void *)&wr, NULL);
>
> > +}
>
> This is *REALLY* terrible...
I pulled this bit from your original patch. Are you concerned about the
stop_machine? Sharing a core is a slow path for our usecases (and as far as I
know, for everyone else's). We can probably do something different if that
requirement changes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists