lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 1 Dec 2020 11:48:15 -0800
From:   John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:     Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Hyesoo Yu <hyesoo.yu@...sung.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, david@...hat.com,
        iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, vbabka@...e.cz,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@...sung.com>,
        John Dias <joaodias@...gle.com>,
        Hridya Valsaraju <hridya@...gle.com>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>,
        linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@....com>,
        "moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" 
        <linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] dma-buf: heaps: add chunk heap to dmabuf heaps

On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 9:51 AM Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> wrote:

Thanks for reworking and resending this!

...
> +static int __init chunk_heap_init(void)
> +{
> +       struct cma *default_cma = dev_get_cma_area(NULL);
> +       struct dma_heap_export_info exp_info;
> +       struct chunk_heap *chunk_heap;
> +
> +       if (!default_cma)
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       chunk_heap = kzalloc(sizeof(*chunk_heap), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!chunk_heap)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       chunk_heap->order = CHUNK_HEAP_ORDER;
> +       chunk_heap->cma = default_cma;
> +
> +       exp_info.name = cma_get_name(default_cma);

So, this would create a chunk heap name with the default CMA name,
which would be indistinguishable from the heap name used for the plain
CMA heap.

Probably a good idea to prefix it with "chunk-" so the heap device
names are unique?

thanks
-john

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ