linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf tools: add aarch64 registers to --user-regs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201201034806.GB28939@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date:   Tue, 1 Dec 2020 11:48:06 +0800
From:   Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To:     Alexandre Truong <alexandre.truong@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        james.clark@....com, John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: add aarch64 registers to --user-regs


Correct for Will's email address, sorry for spamming.

On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 11:46:27AM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 03:39:23PM +0000, Alexandre Truong wrote:
> > Previously, this command returns no help message on aarch64:
> > 
> >   -> ./perf record --user-regs=?
> > 
> >   available registers:
> >   Usage: perf record [<options>] [<command>]
> >       or: perf record [<options>] -- <command> [<options>]
> > 
> > With this change, the registers are listed.
> > 
> >   -> ./perf record --user-regs=?
> > 
> >   available registers: x0 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 x19 x20 x21 x22 x23 x24 x25 x26 x27 x28 x29 lr sp pc
> > 
> > It's also now possible to record subsets of registers on aarch64:
> > 
> >   -> ./perf record --user-regs=x4,x5 ls
> >   -> ./perf report --dump-raw-trace
> > 
> >   12801163749305260 0xc70 [0x40]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x2): 51956/51956: 0xffffaa6571f0 period: 145785 addr: 0
> >   ... user regs: mask 0x30 ABI 64-bit
> >   .... x4    0x000000000000006c
> >   .... x5    0x0000001001000001
> >    ... thread: ls:51956
> >     ...... dso: /usr/lib64/ld-2.17.so
> 
> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> 
> Except this patch for enabling registers on aarch64, it's good to add
> arm32's version in the file arch/arm/util/perf_regs.c.
> 
> Just note for a side topic, I checked a bit for the implementation for
> x86/powerpc, you could consider to enable Statically Defined Tracing
> in the perf_regs.c file as well.  This can be separate task for
> arm/arm64.
> 
> Thanks,
> Leo
> 
> > Cc: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
> > Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Truong <alexandre.truong@....com>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c
> > index 2833e101a..54efa12fd 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c
> > @@ -2,5 +2,38 @@
> >  #include "../../../util/perf_regs.h"
> >  
> >  const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
> > +	SMPL_REG(x0, PERF_REG_ARM64_X0),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x1, PERF_REG_ARM64_X1),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x2, PERF_REG_ARM64_X2),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x3, PERF_REG_ARM64_X3),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x4, PERF_REG_ARM64_X4),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x5, PERF_REG_ARM64_X5),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x6, PERF_REG_ARM64_X6),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x7, PERF_REG_ARM64_X7),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x8, PERF_REG_ARM64_X8),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x9, PERF_REG_ARM64_X9),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x10, PERF_REG_ARM64_X10),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x11, PERF_REG_ARM64_X11),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x12, PERF_REG_ARM64_X12),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x13, PERF_REG_ARM64_X13),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x14, PERF_REG_ARM64_X14),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x15, PERF_REG_ARM64_X15),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x16, PERF_REG_ARM64_X16),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x17, PERF_REG_ARM64_X17),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x18, PERF_REG_ARM64_X18),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x19, PERF_REG_ARM64_X19),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x20, PERF_REG_ARM64_X20),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x21, PERF_REG_ARM64_X21),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x22, PERF_REG_ARM64_X22),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x23, PERF_REG_ARM64_X23),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x24, PERF_REG_ARM64_X24),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x25, PERF_REG_ARM64_X25),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x26, PERF_REG_ARM64_X26),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x27, PERF_REG_ARM64_X27),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x28, PERF_REG_ARM64_X28),
> > +	SMPL_REG(x29, PERF_REG_ARM64_X29),
> > +	SMPL_REG(lr, PERF_REG_ARM64_LR),
> > +	SMPL_REG(sp, PERF_REG_ARM64_SP),
> > +	SMPL_REG(pc, PERF_REG_ARM64_PC),
> >  	SMPL_REG_END
> >  };
> > -- 
> > 2.23.0
> >