linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] s390: cio: fix two use-after-free bugs in device.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 1 Dec 2020 14:31:52 +0800
From:   Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@...wei.com>
To:     Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
CC:     Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390: cio: fix two use-after-free bugs in device.c



在 2020/11/20 15:55, Cornelia Huck 写道:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:48:49 +0800
> Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@...wei.com> wrote:
> 
>> put_device calls release function which do kfree() inside.
>> So following use of sch&cdev would cause use-after-free bugs.
>>
>> Fix these by simply adjusting the position of put_device.
>>
>> Fixes: 37db8985b211 ("s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support")
>> Fixes: 74bd0d859dc3 ("s390/cio: fix unlocked access of online member")
>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/s390/cio/device.c | 6 +++---
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/device.c b/drivers/s390/cio/device.c
>> index b29fe8d50..69492417b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/device.c
>> @@ -1664,10 +1664,10 @@ void __init ccw_device_destroy_console(struct ccw_device *cdev)
>>   	struct io_subchannel_private *io_priv = to_io_private(sch);
>>   
>>   	set_io_private(sch, NULL);
>> -	put_device(&sch->dev);
>> -	put_device(&cdev->dev);
>>   	dma_free_coherent(&sch->dev, sizeof(*io_priv->dma_area),
>>   			  io_priv->dma_area, io_priv->dma_area_dma);
>> +	put_device(&sch->dev);
>> +	put_device(&cdev->dev);
> 
> That change looks reasonable.
> 
>>   	kfree(io_priv);
>>   }
>>   
>> @@ -1774,8 +1774,8 @@ static int ccw_device_remove(struct device *dev)
>>   				      ret, cdev->private->dev_id.ssid,
>>   				      cdev->private->dev_id.devno);
>>   		/* Give up reference obtained in ccw_device_set_online(). */
>> -		put_device(&cdev->dev);
>>   		spin_lock_irq(cdev->ccwlock);
>> +		put_device(&cdev->dev);
> 
> As the comment above states, the put_device() gives up the reference
> obtained in ccw_device_set_online(). There's at least one more
> reference remaining (held by the caller of the remove function). Moving
> the put_device() does not fix anything here.
Hi, Cornelia

Sorry for the delayed reply.

Your suggestion is reasonable, there is a mistake in this patch for I 
didn't notice that there would be at least one more reference remaining.

So I sent a new patch only to move put_device after dma_free_coherent. I 
put the link as below:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201201063150.82128-1-miaoqinglang@huawei.com/

Thanks!
> 
>>   	}
>>   	ccw_device_set_timeout(cdev, 0);
>>   	cdev->drv = NULL;
> 
> .
>