[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201201084713.054184135@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 09:52:04 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>,
Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.9 009/152] btrfs: tree-checker: add missing return after error in root_item
From: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
commit 1a49a97df657c63a4e8ffcd1ea9b6ed95581789b upstream.
There's a missing return statement after an error is found in the
root_item, this can cause further problems when a crafted image triggers
the error.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210181
Fixes: 259ee7754b67 ("btrfs: tree-checker: Add ROOT_ITEM check")
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
@@ -1068,6 +1068,7 @@ static int check_root_item(struct extent
"invalid root item size, have %u expect %zu or %u",
btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot), sizeof(ri),
btrfs_legacy_root_item_size());
+ return -EUCLEAN;
}
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists