[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <e825d155-a5bf-4a41-a43b-7506b401f408@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 12:41:37 +0200
From: Laurențiu Nicola <lnicola@...d.ro>
To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, trivial@...nel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/irq: Lower unhandled irq error severity
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020, at 12:38, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01 2020 at 10:18, Laurențiu Nicola wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020, at 01:34, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> Just for completeness sake. Can you provide the line in /proc/interrupts
> >> for irq 7 on that machine?
> >
> >
> > 55: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI 2625543-edge xhci_hcd
> >
>
> IRQ 55 != IRQ 7. I really meant IRQ 7.
Sorry, I thought they were numbered differently. I guess this 7?
7: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IR-IO-APIC 7-fasteoi pinctrl_amd
Laurențiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists