[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb332889-6385-fe23-be12-5caf150d5817@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 11:46:20 +0100
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
valentin.schneider@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, mark.rutland@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linuxarm@...wei.com, xuwei5@...wei.com, prime.zeng@...ilicon.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] scheduler: expose the topology of clusters and
add cluster scheduler
On 01/12/2020 03:59, Barry Song wrote:
[...]
> Although I believe there is still a lot to do, sending a RFC to get feedbacks
> of community experts might be helpful for the next step.
>
> Barry Song (1):
> scheduler: add scheduler level for clusters
>
> Jonathan Cameron (1):
> topology: Represent clusters of CPUs within a die.
Just to make sure. Since this is v2, the v1 is
https://lkml.kernel.org/r//20201016152702.1513592-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Might not be obvious to everyone since sender and subject have changed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists