linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] s390/vtime: Use the generic IRQ entry accounting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e62cd8fd-802f-1220-e31b-49f4e6916346@de.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Dec 2020 20:34:01 +0100
From:   Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To:     Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] s390/vtime: Use the generic IRQ entry accounting



On 02.12.20 12:57, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> s390 has its own version of IRQ entry accounting because it doesn't
> account the idle time the same way the other architectures do. Only
> the actual idle sleep time is accounted as idle time, the rest of the
> idle task execution is accounted as system time.
> 
> Make the generic IRQ entry accounting aware of architectures that have
> their own way of accounting idle time and convert s390 to use it.
> 
> This prepares s390 to get involved in further consolidations of IRQ
> time accounting.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>

As far as I can tel,l this patch should be a no-op for s390 function-wise.

Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>

> ---
>  arch/Kconfig                  |  7 ++++++-
>  arch/s390/Kconfig             |  1 +
>  arch/s390/include/asm/vtime.h |  1 -
>  arch/s390/kernel/vtime.c      |  4 ----
>  kernel/sched/cputime.c        | 13 ++-----------
>  5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
> index 56b6ccc0e32d..0f151b49c7b7 100644
> --- a/arch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/Kconfig
> @@ -627,6 +627,12 @@ config HAVE_TIF_NOHZ
>  config HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING
>  	bool
>  
> +config HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_IDLE
> +	bool
> +	help
> +	  Architecture has its own way to account idle CPU time and therefore
> +	  doesn't implement vtime_account_idle().
> +
>  config ARCH_HAS_SCALED_CPUTIME
>  	bool
>  
> @@ -641,7 +647,6 @@ config HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN
>  	  some 32-bit arches may require multiple accesses, so proper
>  	  locking is needed to protect against concurrent accesses.
>  
> -
>  config HAVE_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
>  	bool
>  	help
> diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> index 4a2a12be04c9..6f1fdcd3b5db 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ config S390
>  	select HAVE_RSEQ
>  	select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
>  	select HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING
> +	select HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_IDLE
>  	select IOMMU_HELPER		if PCI
>  	select IOMMU_SUPPORT		if PCI
>  	select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/vtime.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/vtime.h
> index 3622d4ebc73a..fac6a67988eb 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/vtime.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/vtime.h
> @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
>  #ifndef _S390_VTIME_H
>  #define _S390_VTIME_H
>  
> -#define __ARCH_HAS_VTIME_ACCOUNT
>  #define __ARCH_HAS_VTIME_TASK_SWITCH
>  
>  #endif /* _S390_VTIME_H */
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/vtime.c b/arch/s390/kernel/vtime.c
> index f9f2a11958a5..ebd8e5655789 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/vtime.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/vtime.c
> @@ -247,10 +247,6 @@ void vtime_account_kernel(struct task_struct *tsk)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vtime_account_kernel);
>  
> -void vtime_account_irq_enter(struct task_struct *tsk)
> -__attribute__((alias("vtime_account_kernel")));
> -
> -
>  /*
>   * Sorted add to a list. List is linear searched until first bigger
>   * element is found.
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> index 61ce9f9bf0a3..2783162542b1 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> @@ -417,23 +417,14 @@ void vtime_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
>  }
>  # endif
>  
> -/*
> - * Archs that account the whole time spent in the idle task
> - * (outside irq) as idle time can rely on this and just implement
> - * vtime_account_kernel() and vtime_account_idle(). Archs that
> - * have other meaning of the idle time (s390 only includes the
> - * time spent by the CPU when it's in low power mode) must override
> - * vtime_account().
> - */
> -#ifndef __ARCH_HAS_VTIME_ACCOUNT
>  void vtime_account_irq_enter(struct task_struct *tsk)
>  {
> -	if (!in_interrupt() && is_idle_task(tsk))
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_IDLE) &&
> +	    !in_interrupt() && is_idle_task(tsk))
>  		vtime_account_idle(tsk);
>  	else
>  		vtime_account_kernel(tsk);
>  }
> -#endif /* __ARCH_HAS_VTIME_ACCOUNT */
>  
>  void cputime_adjust(struct task_cputime *curr, struct prev_cputime *prev,
>  		    u64 *ut, u64 *st)
>