[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMty3ZC-4LTn8RKaRpb6YNogYMgkdopnohEL46P78-XSys48aQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 01:10:24 +0530
From: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Matteo Lisi <matteo.lisi@...icam.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-amarula <linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] arm64: dts: imx8mm: Add Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini SOM
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:07 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 01:00:59AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 11:04 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 05:42:35PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > > i.Core MX8M Mini is an EDIMM SOM based on NXP i.MX8MM from Engicam.
> > >
> > > s/SOM/SoM/
> > >
> > > >
> > > > General features:
> > > > - NXP i.MX8MM
> > >
> > > i.MX 8M Mini
> > > as named by NXP:
> > > https://www.nxp.com/products/processors-and-microcontrollers/arm-processors/i-mx-applications-processors/i-mx-8-processors/i-mx-8m-mini-arm-cortex-a53-cortex-m4-audio-voice-video:i.MX8MMINI
> > >
> > > > - Up to 2GB LDDR4
> > > > - 8/16GB eMMC
> > > > - Gigabit Ethernet
> > > > - USB 2.0 Host/OTG
> > > > - PCIe Gen2 interface
> > > > - I2S
> > > > - MIPI DSI to LVDS
> > > > - rest of i.MX8MM features
> > >
> > > Ditto
> > >
> > > >
> > > > i.Core MX8M Mini needs to mount on top of Engicam baseboards for
> > > > creating complete platform boards.
> > > >
> > > > Possible baseboards are,
> > > > - EDIMM2.2
> > > > - C.TOUCH 2.0
> > >
> > > Don't describe baseboards. You add here only SoM.
> >
> > It's just information on how this SoM is being used. Let me know any
> > issues while explaining the combinations being used here.
>
> Don't describe baseboards. No point to blow up description. Include only
> information relevant to this patch.
It was my basic practice to include combination so-that users or
others can get to know. ie what I did for other SoC's. Yes, will
update here next versions.
Jagan.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists